Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12968 (CAL)

DAMINI CHAUBEY v. AJAY SHANKAR PANDEY

CO/664/2025 · 2026-04-28

Shampa Dutt Paul

Civil Appealbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

28.04.2026 Ct. No. 30 S.L. No. 41 SM CO 664 of 2025 IA No.: CAN 1 of 2025 Smt. Damini Chaubey Versus Sri Ajay Shankar Pandey Mr. Samiran Mondal Ms. Matan Chakraborty …….for the petitioner Mr. Moyukh Mukherjee Mr. Abhijit Singh Ms. Sarmistha Basak …….for the opposite party 1. An error in the order dated 31.03.2026 22.04.2026 has occurred in the cause title in ‘WPA’ be deleted and ‘CO’ be incorporated. 2. The said orders stands modified accordingly. 3. The revisional application has been preferred by the wife/petitioner praying for transfer of Matrimonial Suit no. 34 of 2025 from the Court of the learned District Judge, Paschim Medinipur to the Court of the Learned Additional District Judge, Serampore, District-Hooghly. 4. On hearing the learned counsels for the parties and on perusal of the materials on record, it appears that the Matrimonial Suit has been filed in Paschim Medipur Court by the husband/opposite party herein. 5. The petitioner/wife herein resides at N.C. Mukherjee Lane, Konnagar, Police Station-Uttarpara, District-Hooghly, PIN-712235. 2 6. Considering the said difficulty of the petitioner/wife to travel to Paschim Medinipur Court, on regular basis, this Court relying upon the judgments of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in N.C.V. Aishwarya vs A.S. Saravana Karthik Sha, in Civil Appeal No(s). 4894 of 2022 (arising out of SLP (C) No(s). 16465 of 2021), decided on July 18, 2022, (Para 11, 12) directs that Matrimonial Suit no. 34 of 2025 be withdrawn from the Court of the learned District Judge, Paschim Medinipur and be transferred to the Court of Learned Additional District Judge, Serampore, District-Hooghly. 7. Learned District Judge, Paschim Medinipur shall proceed with the suit in accordance with law with due notice upon both the parties. 8. Keeping in mind the case of the parties herein, the learned District Judge shall be at liberty to permit the opposite party to appear virtually, if such prayer is made. 9. CO 664 of 2025 is disposed of. 10. Parties to act on the server copy of this order. 11. Let a copy of this order be sent to the concerned Courts for immediate compliance. [Shampa Dutt (Paul). J]