1 ( 2026:HHC:24710 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No.673 of 2026 Date of Decision: 24.06.2026 ___________________________________________________ Dr. Rahul Sharma and another ....Petitioners Versus Rakesh Kanwar and another …Respondents ___________________________________________________ Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 ________________________________________________ For the petitioners : Mr. Pavan Kumar, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General. ________________________________________________ Sushil Kukreja, Judge (Oral) Learned Additional Advocate has placed on record communication dated 15.06.2026, alongwith copy of office order of even date, wherein it has been stated that the representations of the petitioners have been considered and decided by the respondent-Department by way of passing office order dated 15.06.2026 2. Therefore, in this view of the matter, no further orders are required to be passed in the present contempt 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 ( 2026:HHC:24710 ) petition and, accordingly, the same is closed and disposed of. Notice discharged 3. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioners to assail the office order dated 15.06.2026, in accordance with law, if they are still aggrieved. The petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. ( Sushil Kukreja ) June 24, 2026 Judge (V. Himalvi)