Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12960 (ALL)

SANTOSH KUMAR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

CRLP/22622/2026 · 2026-10-04

Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing, Tarun Saxena

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 22622 of 2026 Court No. - 48 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J. 1. Mr. Rahul Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, after some length of argument on merit, prayed for leave to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to avail appropriate remedy available under the law. 2. Mr. S.K. Ojha, learned Additional Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the State-respondents as well as Mr. Lal Bahadur Yadav, learned counsel for respondent no. 4 have no objection on the prayer made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners for granting leave to withdraw the instant writ petition. 3. Taking into consideration the submissions and prayer made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and no objection made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State-respondents as well as learned counsel for respondent no.4, leave granted. 4. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty, as prayed. October 5, 2026 SK Srivastava Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rahul Kumar, Rajesh Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Lal Bahadur Yadav (Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Santosh Kumar And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SAILESH KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad