1 APHC010280632019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] WEDNESDAY, THE 14th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NOs: 959/2019 and 619/2024 1. CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.959/2019 Between: SRIRAM KAZA, S/O. PURUSHOTHAM LATE,. HINDU, AGED 42 YEARS, EMPLOYEE, R/O. 22, PLOT NO 420/22, II A MAIN, KASTHURI NAGAR, BANGALORE 560043 ...PETITIONER AND 1. KAZA SRILAKSHMI, D/O D JANAKI RAMA RAO, HINDU, AGED 41 YEARS, EMPLOYEE, D.NO 20-6/6-141C, MAIN ROAD, AYODHYA NAGAR, VIJAYAWADA 2. KAZA SRIVATHSAV, S/O. SRIRAM, HINDU, AGED 17 YEARS, STUDENT, D.NO 20-6/6-141C, MAIN ROAD, AYODHYA NAGAR, VIJAYAWADA 3. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. D BUTCHI BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) 2. PHANI VISWANATH CHALLA 2 2. CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.619 of 2024 Between: SRIRAM KAZA, S/O. PURUSHOTHAM( LATE), HINDU, AGED 47 YEARS, EMPLOYEE, OPP.RYTHU BAZAAR, YERRAGADDA, SANJEEVAREDDYNAGAR,HYDERABAD ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP., BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF A.P., AMARAVATHI. 2. KAZASRILAKSHMI, D/O. D. JANAKI RAMA RAO, HINDU, AGED 46 YEARS. EMPLOYEE, D.NO.20-6/6- 141 C, MAIN ROAD, AYODHYANAGAR, VIJ AYAWADA. 3. KAZA SRIVATHSAVA, S/O. SRIRAM, HINDU, AGED 22 YEARS. STUDENT, D.NO.20-6/6- 141 C, MAIN ROAD, AYODHYA NAGAR, VIJAYAWADA. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. D BUTCHI BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR 2. PHANI VISWANATH CHALLA 3 The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the respondents and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor. 2. The petitioner and the respondents in Crl.R.C.No.959 of 2019 and Crl.R.C.No.619 of 2024, are one and the same. 3. Counsel for both sides in the Criminal Revision Cases mentioned supra submits that the dispute between the parties has been amicably settled out of Court and that no further cause survives for adjudication in the present Criminal Revision Case. 4. Petitioner and respondents are present and submitted that they have entered into a compromise. 5. In view of the above submission, and considering the fact that the parties have arrived at an amicable settlement, the Crl.R.C.No.959 of 2019 and Crl.R.C.No.619 of 2024, are disposed of as compromised. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Dated: 14.10.2026 DRNR 4 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NOs: 959 of 2019 and 619 of 2024 Dated: 14.10.2026 DRNR