Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12954 (KAR)

SRI.C. SIDDHARTHA RAJU v. SMT. NARAYANAMMA

CRL.RP/1003/2018 · 2026-03-18

V Srishananda

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16119 CRL.RP No. 1003 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION No.1003 OF 2018 (397(Cr.PC) / 438(BNSS) BETWEEN: SRI.C. SIDDHARTHA RAJU S/O APPALA NARASIMHA RAJU, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS R/AT NO.367, EMPLOYEES HOUSING CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY, 15TH CROSS, II PHASE, 2ND STAGE, MAHALAKSHMIPURAM POST, BENGALURU-560 086. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. Y.S.PRAVEEN KUMAR FOR SRI NANJUNDA GOWDA M R, ADVOCATES) AND: SMT. NARAYANAMMA W/O LATE MUNIYAPPA @ CHIKKAMUNIYAPPA, SINCE DEATH OF COMPLAINANT/RESPONDENT HER LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES BROUGHT ON RECORD 1(a) SOMASHEKAR.K S/O KRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS 1(b) CHALAPATHY.K S/O KRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS 1(c) CHANDRASHEKAR.K S/O KRISHNAPPA Digitally signed by R MANJUNATHA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16119 CRL.RP No. 1003 of 2018 AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS ALL ARE RESIDING AT ITTAGALLPURA VILLAGE RAJANUKUNTE BENGALURU – 560 064 2. SRI ANAND.C S/O NARAYANAMMA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS 3. SMT.PUSHPALATHA D/O NARAYANAMMA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS 4. SMT.ANSUYA D/O NARAYANAMMA AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS L.R’S 2 TO 4 ARE RESIDING AT VISHWANATHAPURA VILLAGE DEVANAHALLI TALUK BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI D.M.LOHITH FOR SRI K.T.GURUDEVA PRASAD, ADVOCATES) THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 R/W 401 CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 07.04.2017 PASSED BY THE ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C., DEVANAHALLI IN C.C.No.614/2008 AND JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 04.08.2018 PASSED BY THE V ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, DEVANAHALLI IN CRL.A.No.15004/2017 AND BE PLEASED TO ACQUIT THE PETITIONER BY ALLOWING THIS CRL.RP. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16119 CRL.RP No. 1003 of 2018 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER Joint memo filed. Contents of the joint memo reads as under: “The Petitioner and the Legal representative of the respondent submits as follows:- The matter is compromised between the parties for a total sum of Rs. 10,00,000/- (Rupees Ten Lakh Only). Today the petitioner is giving the demand draft to Anusuya for sum of Rs.4,50,000/-(Rupees Four Lakh Fifty Thousand only) bearing D.D. No.840997 dated 13-03-2026 drawn on Bank of Baroda, K.G. Road Branch, Bengaluru. Remaining amount i.e., Rs.1,00,000/- was deposited on 24-04-2017 on the file of the Civil Judge (Jr. Dn), J.M.F.C, Devanahalli and also sum of Rs.4,50,000/- is deposited on 13-11-2018 on the file of the Civil Judge, J.M.F.C at Devanahalli. The petitioner has no objection to withdraw the amount in deposit before the Hon'ble said court. The Demand Draft received by Anusuya on behalf of all the legal representatives. WHEREFORE, the petitioner above named prays that this Hon'ble court be pleased to allow the above case and set aside the judgment and order of conviction dated 07-04- 2017 passed in C.C.No.614/2008 on the file of the Additional Civil Judge and J.M.F.C at Devanahalli and also set aside the judgment and order dated 04-08-2018 - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16119 CRL.RP No. 1003 of 2018 passed by the 5th Additional District & Sessions Judge, Devanahalli, Crl.Appeal No.15504/2017 and acquit the petitioner for the offence punishable under section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act in the interest of justice.” 2. Demand draft in a sum of Rs.4,50,000/- tendered by the revision petitioner to the respondentS. Same is acknowledged in the order sheet. 3. Placing the joint memo on record, revision petition stands disposed of. 4. An affidavit is filed on behalf of the dependents of the original complainant. 5. Placing the affidavit on record, amount in deposit is ordered to be withdrawn by Smt.Anusuya, who is one of the dependent of original complainant, under due identification for and on behalf of dependents of deceased original complainant. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE kcm List No.: 1 Sl No.: 70