Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12951 (BOM)

SAYYAD RIZWAN @ MONU SAYYED REHMAN v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR PSO., PS KARANJA RURAL, TQ. KARANJA DIST. WASHIM AND ANR

APPA/250/2026 · 2026-09-22

Criminal Appealbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 8appa250.2026.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, AT NAGPUR . CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPA) NO. 250 OF 2026 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL STAMP NO. 3528 OF 2026 SAYYAD RIZWAN @ MONU SAYYED REHMAN VS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Ms. Sidua Ahmed h/f Mr. Parvez Mirza, counsel for applicant. Mr. G.S. Umale, APP for non-applicant/State. Mr. Dipankar Kamble, counsel (appointed) for non-applicant No.2. CORAM : Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J. DATED : 22-09-2026 1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the respective parties. 2. By the present application, the applicant / accused is seeking condonation of delay of 347 days caused in lodging the appeal against the order dated 20/12/2024 passed in Criminal Bail Application No. 203 of 2024 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Mangrulpir, District Washim, thereby declined to enlarge the appellant / accused on pre-arrest bail in connection with Crime No. 386 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 103(1), 189 (2), 191(2), 191(3), 190, 79 and 351 (2) of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and Section 3(2) (va), 3(2)(v) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. 3. 3. Learned APP as well as learned appointed counsel for non-applicant No. 2 strongly opposed the application on the ground that the reasons stated therein are neither 2 8appa250.2026.odt bona-fide nor substantial and, therefore, prays for rejection of the application. 4. On perusal of the application, it appears that, due to lack of knowledge of legal procedure and want of proper legal advice, the applicant could not approach this Court within the prescribed period. Therefore, the reasons stated in the application appears to be bonafide and justifiable. Hence, the delay of 347 days while lodging the appeal is hereby condoned. 5. Office to register the appeal and place the matter for further consideration on 07/10/2026. (Y.G. KHOBRAGADE, J.) rkn Signed by: Mr. R.K. NANDURKAR Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 23/09/2026 18:50:14