Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12950 (ORI)

SANJAYA TANDI v. STATE OF ODISHA

BLAPL/1468/2026 · 2026-03-25

Gourishankar Satapathy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK Sanjaya Tandi (In BLAPL No. 1468 of 2026) Nrupa Bagarty & Others (In BLAPL No. 1630 of 2026) … Petitioners Mr. S. Dwibedi, Advocate (In BLAPL No. 1468 of 2026) Mr. S.G. Das, Advocate (In BLAPL No. 1630 of 2026) -versus- State of Odisha … Opposite Party Mr. P. Satpathy, Addl. PP CORAM: JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY Order No. ORDER(ORAL) : 25.03.2026 01. 1. Since these two bail applications arise out of one and same case record, the same are heard together and disposed of by this common order with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties. 2. These are the bail applications U/S.483 of BNSS by the petitioners for grant of bail in connection with Larambha P.S. Case No. 270 of 2025 corresponding to G.R. Case No.1480 of 2025 pending in the file of learned SDJM, Patnagarh, being charge sheeted for commission of offences punishable U/S. 303(2)/61(2)/317(4) of BNS, on the main allegation of committing theft of 900 meters of Electric Aluminum wire (11000volt). 3. Heard, Mr. Suryakanta Dwibedi, learned counsel for the petitioner in BLAPL No. 1468 of 2026, Mr. Siddharth Goutam Das, learned counsel for the petitioners in BLAPL No. 1630 of 2026 and Mr. P. Satpathy, learned Addl. PP in these matters and perused the record. p. 2 4. After having considered the rival submissions and taking into consideration the nature and gravity of the offences as alleged against the petitioners vis-à-vis the accusations sought to be brought against them and regard being had to the pre-trial detention of the petitioners in custody since 05.01.2026 and FIR being lodged against unknown persons, but taking into account the mode and manner of implication of the petitioners and keeping in view the other circumstances on record in entirety including the inherent right of the accused to be presumed innocent until proven guilty at the trial, this Court without expressing any view on merit, admits each of the petitioners to bail. 5. Hence, these two bail applications of the petitioners namely Sanjaya Tandi (BLAPL No. 1468 of 2026) and Nrupa Bagarty, Prasanta Bagarty, Rohita Kumbhar, Bharat Kumbhar, Mukesh Naik & Ashok Mallik (BLAPL No. 1630 of 2026) stand allowed and each of the petitioners is allowed to go on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand) each with two solvent sureties for the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Court in seisin of the case on such terms and conditions as deem fit and proper by it. 6. Accordingly, these BLAPLs stand disposed of. Issue urgent certified copy of the order as per Rules. A soft copy of this order be immediately communicated to the concerned Court, who shall afterwards communicate the same to the concerned Jail through e-mail for reference. (G. Satapathy) Judge S.Sasmal Designation: Jr. Stenographer