[2026:RJ-JP:32178] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13717/2026 CNR: RJHC020687392026 | URN: CW / 29848U / 2026 Manju Kumari D/o Shri Harphul Ram Jangir W/o Shri Ramesh Kumar Jangir, Aged About 51 Years, Resident Of A-109, Indira Nagar, Jhunjhunu - 333001 (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner. 3. Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Through Its Secretary, Ghoogra Ghati, Ajmer. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tanveer Ahamad For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 14/08/2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that present is a second round of litigation and in spite of having judgments directly applicable in the case of petitioner, she is not granted the relief as sought by her. 2. Learned counsel has relied order dated 16.12.2023 (Annexure.6) passed in SBCWP No.7477/2013 i.e. in the first round of litigation, and upon D.B. Special Appeal Writ No.152/2023 titled as Bimala Kumari Vs. State of Rajasthan, judgment dated 27.11.2025. The relevant portion of judgment reproduced herein below:- [2026:RJ-JP:32178] (2 of 3) [CW-13717/2026] “13. In the circumstances, we hold that a person who possesses the qualification of Bachelor of Physical Education on completing the three year degree course would be eligible to be appointed as PTI Grade-III and the non-consideration of such a candidate merely by using a short form of ‘BPE’ and distinguishing it from ‘BPEd’ is a misnomer and an attempt to deprive the more meritorious candidates from appointment. 14. We, therefore, direct that candidature of the appellant shall be considered on merits and if the appellant is found suitable as per the terms of the advertisement, she would be given benefit of consideration for appointment from the date persons lessor to her in the merit having been so appointed with all consequential benefits. However, the benefits will have to be treated as notional but her seniority and her pay fixation notionally shall be done from the date the other persons have been so granted. The actual benefits shall be granted to the appellants-petitioners from the date when the writ petitioners filed the writ petitions. 15. In view of the above, the special appeals are allowed. 16. It is made clear that implementation of this order be made within a period of two months from today.” 3. While placing reliance upon the same, it is submitted that compliance should have been made within a period of two months from passing of the order. He has further submitted that no appeal or SLP against the aforementioned order has been preferred, to the best of his knowledge and the order is thus accepted by the respondents. 4. Heard. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court directs the petitioner to file a representation before the competent authority placing reliance upon the said judgments and the prayer of the petitioner in terms of above referred judgment and on the facts and grounds; the respondents shall consider the [2026:RJ-JP:32178] (3 of 3) [CW-13717/2026] same within a period of 30 days in accordance with law, by way of a speaking order. 6. Present petition is accordingly, disposed of. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed. 7. However, petitioner will be at liberty to take appropriate recourse in her lis in question still survives. (SAMEER JAIN),J 10/CHANDAN