OM PRAKASH KAITH v. JOGINDER SINGH THAKUR AND ANOTHER
CMP.M/538/2026 · 2026-06-19
Romesh Verma
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 12948 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 12948 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA
CMP (M) No. 538/2026 in RSA No. 131/2020
Decided on: 19.06.2026
Om Prakash Kaith
…..Appellant/Applicant
Versus
Joginder Singh Thakur & ors …Respondents/Contemnors ______________________________________________________________
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice RomeshVerma, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Applicant: Mr. Sudhir Thakur, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Somesh Sharma, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. Vipin Pandit, Advocate, for
respondents No. 1 and 2.
Ms. Kanta Thakur, Advocate, for
respondent No.3.
Romesh Verma, Judge (oral)
Learned counsel for the applicant states that he has instructions to withdraw the instant application. His statement is taken on record.
Accordingly, the instant application is dismissed as having been withdrawn.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge 19.6.2026 (pankaj)
1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.