1 CAO-1002-2026.odt 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. CIVIL APPLICATION (O) NO.1002 OF 2026 IN CIVIL APPLICATION (W) NO.2385 OF 2026 IN WRIT PETITION NO.7983 OF 2025 (D) [Jitendra S/o Dhyaneshwar Choudhari .vs. The Senior Regional Manager, Food Corporation of India and another] --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda Court's or Judge's orders of Coram, Appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri. Mihir Puranik, Adv. h/f Y. V. Chavan, Advocate for Applicant/Petitioner. Shri. Sachin Deshpande, Advocate for Respondents. CORAM : URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE AND RAJ D. WAKODE, JJ. DATED : 28 th SEPTEMBER, 2026. 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner invited our attention to the order dated 22nd September, 2026, and submitted that the factual positions are incorrectly recorded. He submitted that, in paragraph No.2, while passing the order, it is mentioned that, “By this application, the applicant/petitioner is seeking direction to Central Government Industrial Tribunal, Nagpur to expedite proceeding as mentioned in Annexure-A pending before it and decide the same in a time-bound manner.” 2. He submitted that, in fact, the matter is already expedited by the order of this Court dated 15th December, 2025, and therefore, it is required to be mentioned that, by the order dated 15th December, 2025, the matter is already expedited and the period granted is about to expire on 29th September, 2026, and therefore, an extension be granted. 2026:BHC-NAG:12822-DB 1 CAO-1002-2026.odt 2 3. Accordingly, paragraph No.2 of the order dated 22nd September, 2026 is to be corrected as “By this application, the petitioner is seeking extension to Central Government Industrial Tribunal, Nagpur to dispose of the proceeding in a further period of six months, as the earlier period of eight months granted is about to expire on 29th September, 2026.” 4. Similarly, in paragraph No.3 of the said order, it is recorded that, “Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that reference is pending since 2003 and it is not yet decided.” In fact, the reference is already decided. Therefore, paragraph No.3 is required to be corrected as “Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the reference is already decided.” 5. The order be corrected accordingly and the corrected order be uploaded. 6. By this order, we direct the Central Government Industrial Tribunal, Nagpur, to dispose of the application within a further period of six months from tomorrow, i.e., 29th September, 2026. 7. Civil Application No.2385 of 2026 and Civil Application No.1002 of 2026 are disposed of accordingly. (RAJ D. WAKODE, J.) (URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J.) TAMBE Signed by: Mr. Ashish Tambe Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 28/09/2026 21:55:32