Om Prakash Vs. Bandana Kumari and Anr. Cr.MP(M) No. 717 of 2026 23.06.2026 Present: Mr. Prashant Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Gaurav Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the applicant/petitioner. Mr. Jagan Nath, Advocate, for respondents No. 1 and 2. Cr.MP(M) No. 717 of 2026 This application has been filed for condonation of delay of 4 days in filing the revision petition. Prayer made on behalf of applicant has been opposed by learned counsel for the respondent on the ground that day to day delay, as required to be explained under law, has not been explained. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that there were justifiable and sufficient reasons which prevented the applicant from filing the main petition within the prescribed period. Considering the averments made in the application and submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, we are of the considered opinion that delay in filing the review petition deserves to be condoned. Accordingly, the delay of four days in filing the main petition is condoned. Application is allowed and disposed of. Cr. Revision No………….of 2026 Cr. Rev (FC) ST 1738/2026 Be registered. Respondents are duly represented. Power of attorney on their behalf be filed within two weeks. Record be requisitioned. List for consideration on 21.09.2026. Cr.MP No……… of 2026 Cr.MPST 1739 of 2026 Be registered. Notice in the aforesaid terms. List for consideration alongwith the main petition on the next date. ( Vivek Singh Thakur ) Judge ( Ranjan Sharma ) Judge 23rd June, 2026 (sushma) Om Prakash Vs. Bandana Kumari and Anr. Cr.MP(M) No. 717 of 2026 23.06.2026 Present: Mr. Prashant Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Gaurav Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the applicant/petitioner. Mr. Jagan Nath, Advocate, for respondents No. 1 and 2. Cr.MP(M) No. 717 of 2026 This application has been filed for condonation of delay of 4 days in filing the revision petition. Prayer made on behalf of applicant has been opposed by learned counsel for the respondent on the ground that day to day delay, as required to be explained under law, has not been explained. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that there were justifiable and sufficient reasons which prevented the applicant from filing the main petition within the prescribed period. Considering the averments made in the application and submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, we are of the considered opinion that delay in filing the review petition deserves to be condoned. Accordingly, the delay of four days in filing the main petition is condoned. Application is allowed and disposed of. Cr. Revision No………….of 2026 Cr. Rev (FC) ST 1738/2026 Be registered. Respondents are duly represented. Power of attorney on their behalf be filed within two weeks. Record be requisitioned. List for consideration on 21.09.2026. Cr.MP No……… of 2026 Cr.MPST 1739 of 2026 Be registered. Notice in the aforesaid terms. List for consideration alongwith the main petition on the next date. ( Vivek Singh Thakur ) Judge ( Ranjan Sharma ) Judge 23rd June, 2026 (sushma)