1 2026:CGHC:6702 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 1303 of 2024 1 - Uttam Kumar Paikra S/o Babunath Singh, Aged About 32 Years R/o Ward No. 18, Rajapara, Village-Sarbhoka, Baikunthpur, Tahsil-Patna, District-Korea (C.G.) ... Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Chief Secretary General Administration Department Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Civil And Revenue District-Raipur (Cg) 490002 2 - Directorate, Public Instruction Department Of School Education, C Wing, Naya Raipur, District-Raipur (Cg) 3 - Joint Director Education Officer, Division Bastar, Jagdalpur (C.G.) 4 - Block Education Officer, Bainkunthpur, District-Koriya (C.G.) ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Barun Kumar Chakrabarty, Advocate For Respondents-State : Ms. Deeksha Gauraha, Dy. Government Advocate SB: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge ORDER ON BOARD 06/02 /2026 1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs:- “10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may please be kind enough in calling the entire records pertaining to the impugned orders and the impugned correspondence. 10.2 That, the order (Annexure P/6) passed by the Respondent No. 3 is illegal and deserves to be set- aside. 10.3 Because the entire process adopted by the respondents is slip shot arbitrary and is being violative of Article 14, 15, 21, 31 (a) (c) (e) and (f). 2 10.4 That respondents to provided fresh appointment orders appointment of the petitioner in Sarguja Division as per Advertisement. 10.5 That any other relief which this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case may kindly be awarded in favour of the petitioner.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at present, he is not pressing this writ petition on merits and is only seeking permission to submit a fresh representation before the concerned authority for redressal of his grievance as raised in this writ petition. 3. Learned counsel for the Respondents/State would submit that as the petitioner is not pressing this writ petition on merits, she is having no objection to the limited prayer. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents placed on record. 5. On due consideration of the submission of counsel for the respective parties, facts and circumstances of the case, nature of grievance raised, without entering into the merits of the claim of petitioner, this writ petition at this stage is disposed of permitting the petitioner to submit afresh comprehensive representation before the concerned authority and if such a representation is submitted by the petitioner, concerned authority shall consider and take decision on the representation to be submitted by the petitioner on its own merits in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a further period of 03 months from the date of receipt of representation. 6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, this writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Dey SHUBHAM DEY Digitally signed by SHUBHAM DEY Date: 2026.02.07 17:49:52 +0530