Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12927 (DEL)

AJAY SEJWAL ALIAS SONI v. THE STATE, GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI

BAIL APPLN./1598/2026 · 2026-07-23

Girish Kathpalia

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

$~2 to 4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 1429/2026 & CRL.M.A. 11334/2026 SONU .....Petitioner Through: Mr Siddharth Batra and Mr. Chinmay Dubey, Advocates. versus STATE OF (NCT) DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for State with SI Rajesh Kumar Mr. Chinmaya K. Bhatt, Advocate for Complainant (through video conferencing). 3 + BAIL APPLN. 1595/2026 & CRL.M.(BAIL) 857/2026 SIKANDAR SINGH TANDON .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajender Singh and Mr. Hiren Sharma, Advocates versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for State with SI Rajesh Kumar Mr. Chinmaya K. Bhatt, Advocate for Complainant (through video conferencing). 4 + BAIL APPLN. 1598/2026 & CRL.M.(BAIL) 862/2026 AJAY SEJWAL ALIAS SONI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajender Singh and Mr. Hiren Sharma, Advocates This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/07/2026 at 11:53:51 versus THE STATE, GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for State with SI Rajesh Kumar Mr. Chinmaya K. Bhatt, Advocate for Complainant (through video conferencing). CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA O R D E R % 23.07.2026 1. The accused/applicants seek anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 409/2023 of PS Chhawla for offence under Section 306/34 IPC. 2. On being pointed out the contents of paragraph 7 of order dated 05.06.2026 in contrast with paragraph 6 of order dated 15.04.2026, both learned counsel for all these accused/applicants, on instructions, seek permission to unconditionally withdraw these anticipatory bail applications, so that they surrender and apply for regular bail. However, in case after surrender of the accused/applicants, the IO does not want to arrest them (which is the claim of learned counsel for accused/applicants but denied by prosecution side), it shall be obviously the prerogative of the IO. 3. As requested, the anticipatory bail applications and the accompanying application are dismissed as withdrawn. It is made clear that withdrawal of these applications shall not be read to the prejudice of the accused/applicants at the time of hearing their regular bail applications. GIRISH KATHPALIA, J JULY 23, 2026/as This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/07/2026 at 11:53:51