Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12927 (CHH)

KULDEEP NARAYAN DESHMUKH v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH,

WPS/1894/2020 · 2026-02-23

Shri Sanjay K Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:9606 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 1894 of 2020 1 - Kuldeep Narayan Deshmukh S/o Bhisham Lal Deshmukh, Aged About 66 Years Retired Pharmacist Grade - I I, R/o Village Borai, Tahsil And District Durg Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 2 - Menka Deshmukh D/o Kuldeep Narayan Deshmukh, Aged About 35 Years R/o Village Borai, Tahsil And District Durg Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioners Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary, Department Of Health And Family Welfare, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Director, Ayush, Old Nurses Hostel, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Old Mantralaya, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - District Ayurveda Officer, Jagdalpur, District Bastar Chhattisgarh., District : Bastar(Jagdalpur), Chhattisgarh 4 - Joint Director, Treasury, Account And Pension, Durg Division, District Durg Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 5 - District Treasury Officer, Durg, District Durg Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents [Cause-title taken from Case Information System (CIS)] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Petitioner : Mr. Govind Dewangan, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. Amit Buxy, Dy. Government Advocate ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Single Bench: Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal (Order on Board) 24.02.2026 1. Heard. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for the relief sought in this petition/redressal of his grievance, the petitioner may be SAIFAN KHAN Digitally signed by SAIFAN KHAN 2 permitted to file a representation before the respondents-authorities and same may be directed to be decided within a reasonable. 3. Be that as it may, the petitioner is permitted to file a comprehensive representation submitting his grievance with regard to the relief sought in this petition alongwith copy of this order and supportive documents before the concerned respondents authorities within 04 weeks’ from today and, in turn, the concerned respondents are directed to consider and decide petitioner’s said representation in accordance with law by passing a reasoned and speaking order preferably within 06 weeks from the date of receipt of said representation. 4. With aforesaid observation and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. No cost. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge s@if