Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12924 (JHR)

BHOLA SAHU ALIAS ANIL SAHU ALIAS BHOLA KUMAR SAHU v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cr.M.P./610/2026 · 2026-05-15

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:15240] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No. 610 of 2026 1. Bhola Sahu @ Anil Sahu @ Bhola Kumar Sahu, Aged About 32 years, 2. Birsa Sahu @ Saroj Sahu, Aged about 44 years, 3. Daswa Sahu @ Sharavan Sahu, Aged About 39 Years, All 3 sons of- Late Chunnu Lal Sahu, 4. Mahavir Sahu, Aged About 87 years, Son of- Late Parsu Sahu, 5. Pradeep Sahu, Aged About 56 years, S/o- Bhawani Shankar Sahu, All R/o- Village Hochar, Po- Husir, PS- Kanke, Dist- Ranchi. … Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Surendra Prasad, Aged About 52 Years, Son of Late Rajeshwar Prasad Singh, R/o- Neelanchal Kothi Compound, Piska More, Ratu Road, Po-Hehal, PS-Sukhdeonagar, Dist- Ranchi. … Opp. Parties Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY For the Petitioner : Mr. Avishek Prasad , Adv. For the State : Ms. Priya Shrestha, Spl. PP For the O.P.No. 2 : None 03 / 15.05.2026 Heard the parties. Though notice has validly been served upon the Opp. Party No. 2 but no one turns up on behalf of the Opp. Party No. 2 in spite of repeated calls. This criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed at the instance of the petitioners for restoration of Cr.M.P. No. 3767 of 2025 to its original file. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the Cr.M.P. No. 3767 of 2025 was dismissed vide order dated 16.01.2026 for non-compliance of the order of filing requisites for service of notice upon the Opp. Party No. 2 within the peremptory period. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that due to inadvertence, the petitioners could not comply the said order, which resulted in dismissal of Cr.M.P. No. 3767 of 2025. It is further submitted that the petitioners have very good grounds to agitate in this case and unless the same is restored to its original file, the petitioners will be highly prejudiced. Hence, it is submitted that Cr.M.P. No. 3767 of 2025 be restored to its original file. Learned Spl. P.P. has no serious objection for the prayer of restoration. Considering the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, Cr.M.P. No. 3767 of 2025 is restored to its original file to the stage, at which, it was before its dismissal. List Cr.M.P. No. 3767 of 2025 after a week. This criminal miscellaneous petition is disposed of accordingly. (ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.) Dated 15.05.2026 Smita/-