121 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-12715-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision : 27.04.2026 Hardeep Singh ... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and Others ... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI Present : Mr. Atul Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Aman Dhir, DAG Punjab. ALKA SARIN, J. (Oral) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner would be satisfied if a direction is issued to the respondent-Authorities to decide the representations (Annexures P-7 to P-9) filed by the petitioner and to take action in accordance with the law in a time-bound manner. 2. Notice of motion. 3. Mr. Aman Dhir, DAG Punjab accepts notice on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 3. Learned State counsel on instructions from Sh. Preet Mohinder Singh Sahota, DDPO, Amritsar states that the needful would be done and the obstruction in the passage would be removed positively within a period of two months from today. JITENDER KUMAR 2026.04.28 10:30 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Chandigarh CWP-12715-2026 -2- 4. In view of the statement made by the learned State counsel, learned counsel for the petitioner states that he does not wish to press the present petition at this stage. 5. Dismissed as not pressed. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed off. ( ALKA SARIN ) JUDGE 27.04.2026 jk ( RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI ) JUDGE NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: YES/NO JITENDER KUMAR 2026.04.28 10:30 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Chandigarh