Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1291 (JHR)

SACHIDANAND MEHRA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

WPC/1465/2026 · 2026-03-09

Sri Ananda Sen

Public Interest Litigationbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:6177 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No.1465 of 2026 ------ 1. Sachidanand Mehra, aged about 51 years, S/o- Arjun Mehra, Residence-Vill-Binjha, P.O.-Dumariya, P.S.- Sarath, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand. 2. Zeya Firdos, aged about 38 years, W/o- Kjawaja Md Ayaz Khan, Residence of At-Flat No.B-1, Alam Enclave Dhipatoli Argora Khathal More Road, Pundag, P.O.-Jagarnathpur, P.S.- Jagarnathpur, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand. 3. Nirmala Kumari, aged about 41 years, W/o- Sanjay Lohra, Residence of Vill-Champadih, P.O.-Raghunathpur, P.S.-Chanho, District- Ranchi, Jhakhand. 4. Rina Kumari, aged about 37 years, W/o- Manoj Khalkho, Residence of Vill- Gorkho, P.O.- Mukuni, P.S.- Mandar, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand. 5. Kapila Tirkey, aged about 50 years, W/o- Raphael Tirkey, Residence of Vill- Semra, P.O.- Bindhani, P.S.-Itki, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand. … … Petitioner(s) Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. The Principal Secretary, School Education and Literacy Department, Government of Jharkhand, Having its Office at Project Building Dhurwa, P.O.- Dhurwa, P.S.- Jagarnathpur, District- Ranchi. 3. The Principal Secretary, Personnal Administrative Reforms and Raj Bhasha Department, Govt. of Jharkhand, Having its office at Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O.- Dhurwa, P.S.- Jagarnathpur, Dist-Ranchi. 4. The Director, Secondary Education, Government of Jharkhand, Having its Office at Project Building Dhurwa, P.O.- Dhurwa, P.S.- Jagarnathpur, District- Ranchi. 5. The Chairman, Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission, Ranchi, Having its office at Project Building Dhurwa, P.O.- Dhurwa, P.S.- Jagarnathpur, District- Ranchi. 6. The Secretary, Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission, Ranchi, Having its office at Project Building Dhurwa, P.O.- Dhurwa, P.S.- Jagarnathpur, District- Ranchi. 7. The Examination Controller, Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission, Ranchi, Having its office at Project Building Dhurwa, P.O.- Dhurwa, P.S.- Jagarnnathpur, District- Ranchi … … Opposite Party(s) ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shubham Mishra, Advocate Mr. Kazi Asif Iqubal, Advocate. Mr. Gyandev Raj, Advocate. For the J.S.S.C. : Mr. Tejo Mistry, Advocate. ----- 02/ 09th March, 2026 1. The petitioners in this writ petition claims appointment to the post of "Trained Graduate Teachers" pursuant to the Advertisement No. 21 of 2016. It is a case of the petitioners that they have obtained more marks than the cut-off marks, but their case has not been considered and they have not been appointed. Thus, their 2026:JHHC:6177 2 candidature needs to be considered. 2. The counsel appearing on behalf of J.S.S.C., on instruction submits that all these petitioners have obtained lesser marks than the last selected candidate in the subject and the category of the petitioners. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of J.S.S.C, Mr. Tejo Mistry handed over a chart showing the details of marks obtained by the petitioners and the state wise marks obtained by the last selected candidate. 4. After going through the same, I find that all the petitioners have obtained lesser marks than the last selected candidate. It is necessary to mention the category and marks obtained by the petitioners and the last selected candidate as per the chart:- S.L No. Name Roll Number Subject Category Marks of the petitioner Marks of last Selected Candidate in State wise Result 1. Sachidanand Mehra 28182268358 History and Civics S.C. 176 220 2. Zeya Firdos 14129143132 Biology and Chemistry U.R. 164 170 3. Nirmala Kumari 13113131682 Hindi S.T. 162 200 4. Rina Kumari 25112218841 Nagpuri S.T. 118 136 5. Kapila Tirkey 31115279658 Geography S.T. 170 184 5. The chart handed over to this court by Mr. Tejo Mistry, learned counsel appearing on behalf of J.S.S.C. is kept on record. 6. On the aforesaid ground, since admittedly the petitioners have obtained lesser marks than the last selected candidate in the subject and category of the petitioners, this writ petition stands dismissed. 7. It is made clear that since the appointment process is continuing, if it is found in future that any person obtaining lesser marks than the petitioners in the category and subject of any of the petitioners has been appointed, the respective petitioner is at liberty to approach J.S.S.C. for appropriate relief. (ANANDA SEN, J.) 09.03.2026 Amar/CP-2 Uploaded on:- 13.03.2026