Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12905 (CHH)

Radhe Shyam Uke v. Syed Kazim Ali

FA/190/2016 · 2026-02-05

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:6739 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR FA No. 190 of 2016 Radhe Shyam Uke S/o Sitaram Uke, Aged About 65 Years R/o Magarpara, Bilaspur, Tahsil And District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ................Plaintiff, Chhattisgarh ... Appellant versus 1 - Syed Kazim Ali S/o Shri Syed Imam Ali, Aged About 32 Years R/o Masanganj, Bilaspur, Tahsil And District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh 2 - Dharika W/o Sanjay Meshram, Aged About 40 Years R/o Raj Kishor Nagar House Of Aau Meshram, Chindi-Bazar Wale Bilaspur, Tahsil And District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 3 - State Of Chhattisgarh, Through The Collector, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Smt. Veena Dixit W/o Ashish Dixit, Aged About 32 Years R/o Gole Bazar, Near City Kotwali, Bilaspur, Tahsil And District Bilaspur, SHOAIB ANWAR Digitally signed by SHOAIB ANWAR Date: 2026.02.06 16:26:51 +0530 2 Chhattisgarh, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 5 - Radhe Shyam Soni S/o Shiv Prasad Soni, Aged About 48 Years R/o Marimai Road, Talapara, Bilaspur, Tahsil And District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ................Defendants, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from CIS) For Appellant : None For Respondent No. 3 :Shri Anand Gupta, Dy. Govt. Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru , Judge Order on Board 06.02.2026 1. None appears nor any representation made on behalf of the appellant to press this appeal.. 2. In view of the above, it appears that the appellant has lost interest in pursuing the present matter. 3. Accordingly, the present appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) Judge Shoaib