Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
28.04.2026 Court No.28 Item No.4 ssi CRM (A) 1040 of 2026
In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Suraksha Nagarik Sanhita in connection with Baishnabnagar Police Station Case No. 1084 of 2025 dated 23.08.2025 under Sections 329 (3)/132/223/111(3)/111(4)/ 324(4)/ 3(5) of the BNS, 2023 read with Sections 21 ( C)/29 of the NDPS Act. And In the matter of: Abdul Alim @ Alim Sk. …. Petitioner
Md. Wasim Akram Ms. Sabrina Parveen …for the petitioner
Mr. Suman De Mr. Kunal Ganguly
…for the State
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. Charge sheet has been submitted.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State submits that the application for anticipatory bail of three other co-accused was earlier rejected by this Court. The petitioner stands on the same footing. The petitioner, along with others, was transporting contraband across the Bangladesh border. When they were challenged by the BSF, they allegedly hurled grenades and fled away. While they were coming back, they were identified and named by local witnesses.
Considering the above, the other materials available in the case diary and the restrictions contained in Section 37 of the NDPS Act, I do not consider this is to be a fit case for granting anticipatory bail.
Accordingly, the application for anticipatory bail is rejected.
2
Urgent photostat certified copy of this order be supplied to the parties, if applied for, as early as possible.
(Jay Sengupta, J.)