Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12903 (DEL)

RAJBIR SINGH & ORS. v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

W.P.(C)/9759/2026 · 2026-07-22

Amit Bansal

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.(C) 9759/2026 $~76 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 9759/2026, CM APPL. 45508/2026 & CM APPL. 45509/2026 RAJBIR SINGH & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Dharamvir Singh, Advocate (Through VC) versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Mrinalini Sen, SC with Mr. Pranay Lakhanpal, Advocate for DDA Mr. Vikrant Pachnanda, SPP with Mr. Mukul Katyal, Advocate for CBI Mr. Aditya Chandra, Standing Counsel with Mr. Durga Dass Vashist, Advocate for R-4 and R-5/MCD Mr. Niraj Kumar, Senior Central Government Counsel with Mr. Chatanya Kumar, Advocate for R-7 to R-9, P.S. Kanjhawala CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL O R D E R % 22.07.2026 1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking to restrain the private respondent no.2 from carrying out unauthorised construction over the land bearing Khasra Nos.6/18/1, 18/2 (3-02), 19(5-18), 21/2(4-00), 22(4-16)23/1(3-01),9/2(4-16) total land measuring (25-02) situated at This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/07/2026 at 12:33:48 W.P.(C) 9759/2026 Revenue Estate of Village of Village Madanpur Dabas, Delhi-110081 (hereinafter ‘subject property’). It is stated that some unknown land mafias are carrying out construction in the subject property. 2. The petitioners have admitted in the writ petition that the petitioners sold their land in question to the private respondent no.2 in the year 2006. It is the case of the petitioners that since the petitioners did not receive the full payment, the physical possession of the subject property has not been delivered to the private respondent no.2. In this regard, the petitioners have filed a suit for declaration of the petitioners as Bhumidhar in respect of the subject property before the concerned authority. 3. It is clear from the facts noted above that there is an ongoing civil dispute between the parties. 4. In view of the above, the present writ petition is disposed of while directing the respondent-MCD and the respondent no.11/DDA to inspect the subject land and take action against the unauthorised construction, if any, in accordance with law. 5. Pending applications stand disposed of. AMIT BANSAL, J JULY 22, 2026 ds This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/07/2026 at 12:33:48