HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 8473 of 2016 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. Sri Siblu Pandey, counsel for respondents states that Suit No. 25 of 2009 itself has been decided by judgment dated 27.02.2026, as such, the matter has become infructuous. 2. In view of said fact, as the suit has already been decided, the petition has become infructuous and stands dismissed. October 8, 2026 (V. S. SINGH) Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Suneel Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : Rohit Shukla, Rohitashwa Upadhyay, Siblu Panday (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Bachanu And 4 Others .....Petitioner(s) Anara Devi And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VIDYA SAGAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad