Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 129 (CHH)

DAGA METAL AGENCY v. DURGA PRASAD VARMA

MCC/79/2026 · 2026-01-27

Smt Rajani Dubey

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:4665 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 79 of 2026 Daga Metal Agency, Raipur through Proprietor Sharad Daga, aged about 50 years (At present near about 70 years), S/o Shri Punam Chand Daga, occupation Utensils business, R/o Budapara Raipur, Tahsil and District- Raipur (C.G.) ... Applicant Versus 1 - Durga Prasad Varma S/o Tika Ram Kasar, aged about 77 years, utensil business, R/o Polsai Para, P.S. Durg, Tahsil and District Durg (C.G.). 2 - Kamta Prasad S/o Durga Prasad Kasar, aged about 54 years, utensil business, R/o Polsai Para, P.S. Durg, Tahsil and District Durg (C.G.). 3 - Dhanna Lal Verma S/o Durga Prasad Kasar, aged about 46 years, utensil business, R/o Polsai Para, P.S. Durg, Tahsil and District Durg (C.G.). 4 - Purushottam Das S/o Durga Prasad Kasar, aged about 42 years, utensil business, R/o Polsai Para, P.S. Durg, Tahsil and District Durg (C.G.). 5 - Mukesh Kumar Verma S/o Durga Prasad Kasar, aged about 38 years, utensil business, R/o Polsai Para, P.S. Durg, Tahsil and District Durg (C.G.). 6 - Santosh Kumar S/o Durga Prasad Kasar, aged about 32 years, utensil business, R/o Polsai Para, P.S. Durg, Tahsil and District Durg (C.G.). Digitally signed by RAVVA UTTEJ KUMAR RAJU 2 7 - Pradeep Kumar Daga S/o Punamchand Daga, aged about 36 years, utensil business, R/o Budapara Raipur, Tahsil and District Raipur (C.G.) ... Respondents (Cause title is taken from Case Information System Software) For Applicant : Mr. Aditya Dhar Diwan, Advocate. For Respondents : Mr. Amit Naik, Counsel on behalf of Mr. Avinash Chand Sahu, Advocate. Hon’ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey,J. Order on Board 28.01.2026 1. The present MCC has been filed seeking restoration of F.A. No. 19 of 2008 which was dismissed in default on 20.03.2024 by this Court. 2. Considering the reasons assigned therein and submissions made by counsel for the Applicant, present MCC which is duly supported by an affidavit, deserves to be and is accordingly allowed and F.A. No. 19 of 2008 stands restored to its original number, subject to payment of Rs. 5000/- to the High Court Legal Aid Services Committee. 3. Accordingly, the instant MCC stands disposed of. Sd/- (Rajani Dubey) Judge U.K. Raju