Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12898 (RAJ)

POONAM YADAV W/O VIKRAM YADAV v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/3910/2026 · 2026-08-03

Anil Kumar Upman

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:30127] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 3910/2026 CNR: RJHC020583522026 | URN: CRLMP / 8797U / 2026 1. Poonam Yadav W/o Vikram Yadav, R/o Wing-3C, Flate No. 801, M.V.L., Coral Society, Bhiwadi, District Kharithal- Tijara (Raj.). 2. Vansh S/o Vikram Yadav, R/o Wing-3C, Flate No. 801, M.V.L., Coral Society, Bhiwadi, District Khairthal-Tijara (Raj.). ----Accused-Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ---Respondent 2. Divya Rani W/o Sh. Bhavishya Sharma, R/o Wing-3C, Flate No. 802, M.V.L. Coral Society, Bhiwadi, District Khairthal-Tijara (Raj.) ----Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vineet Dixit, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP with Mr. M.S. Choudhary, PP and Mr. Prakash Chand Thakuriya, Adv., for complainant. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 03/08/2026 1. Matter comes upon an application (I.A. No.1/2026) for taking certain documents of the compromise on record. 2. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed. 3. Matter is being heard and decided today itself with the consent of the parties. [2026:RJ-JP:30127] (2 of 3) [CRLMP-3910/2026] 4. By way of this criminal misc. petition under Section 528 of BNSS, the accused-petitioners have approached this Court with a prayer to quash criminal proceedings arising out of FIR No.225/2026 registered at Police Station Bhiwadi, District Bhiwadi for the offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 119(1) and 3(5) of BNS, 2023 on the basis of compromise. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the parties have resolved their dispute amicably. Counsel submits that on account of compromise, further proceedings in the impugned FIR are fruitless and continuation thereof would be a futile exercise and a waste of precious judicial time and resources. A compromise deed executed between the parties has been placed on record. 6. Learned counsel for the complainant submits that parties have resolved their dispute amicably and complainant has no objection if the present misc. petition is allowed. 7. In view of the aforesaid and considering the submissions made on behalf of the respective parties; the material made available for perusal; considering the fact that parties have resolved their dispute amicably and also finding that the present case is wholly covered by the principle of law laid down by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the case of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr. reported in 2012 Cr.L.J. (SC) 4934 and in the case of State of Haryana & Ors. Vs. Choudhary Bhajan Lal & Ors. reported in AIR 1992 SC 604 and as such, the impugned FIR is liable to be quashed in view of compromise arrived at between the parties. [2026:RJ-JP:30127] (3 of 3) [CRLMP-3910/2026] 8. In view of the above, this Criminal Misc. Petition is allowed and the FIR No.225/2026 registered at Police Station Bhiwadi, District Bhiwadi alongwith all consequential criminal proceedings arising out of it are quashed and set aside. Consequence to follow. 9. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J 457/MADAN