IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.9436 of 2026 Decided on: 23.06.2026 Rakesh Kumar … Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 ____________________________________________________ _ For the petitioner: Mr. Adarsh K. Vashisht, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Assistant Advocate General, for the respondents-State. Mr. Sohan Singh Rathore, Advocate, for respondents No.3 and 4. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) When this case was taken up for consideration, on a query put to the learned Counsel for the petitioner with regard to the remedies available against the order under challenge, learned Counsel submitted that as second appeal is provided to under the rules relating to terms of employment etc. of the cases before the Board of Directors. 2. In light of this fact, this petition is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to avail the said remedy. The petition stands disposed of, so also pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge June 23, 2026 (Rishi) 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?