Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12895 (MAD)

M.Shanmugam v. M.Arul

CONT P/978/2026 · 2026-03-25

S Sounthar

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Cont.P.No.978 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 25.03.2026 CORAM : THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR Cont.P.No.978 of 2026 M.Shanmugam .. Petitioner Versus M.Arul, The Tahsildar, Pochampalli Taluk, Krishnagiri District. .. Respondent Prayer : Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Court Act, 1971, to punish the respondent herein for their act of wilful disobedience of the order of this Court, dated 20.08.2024 in W.P.No.23618 of 2024. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Thamaraiselvan For Respondents : Mr.Abishek Murthy, Government Advocate ORDER When the matter is taken up for hearing, Mr.Abishek Murthy, learned Government Advocate for the respondent submits that pursuant to the direction issued in the main Writ Petition, the respondent herein, in his 1/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.No.978 of 2026 proceedings in g/K/4645/2025/vy;/Mh;/2 dated 20.03.2026, considered the representation of the petitioner and passed orders. A copy of the order is also handed over to the learned Counsel for the petitioner. 2. Recording the same, this Contempt Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 25.03.2026 Index : yes/no Speaking order/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation : yes/no grs 2/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.No.978 of 2026 S.SOUNTHAR, J., grs Cont.P.No.978 of 2026 25.03.2026 3/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis