CWP-14148-202 IN TH Gurpreet Singh State of Haryan CORAM: HON Present: - Mr. Ms. for t Mr. *** JAGMOHAN 1. The the Constitution restore his securi 2. Lear security by High Witness Protecti No.145 dated 15. 25 of the Arms They may at any and mental injury 3. Lear examined the m 2026 -1- N THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AT CHANDIGAR CW Dat Singh Versus aryana & others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGM Mr. P.S.Hundal, Senior Advocate, w Ms. Arshpreet Kaur and Mr. Jasjeet for the petitioner. Mr. Deepak Vashisth, DAG, Haryan *** AN BANSAL, J. (Oral) The petitioner through instant petit tution of India is seeking direction to security as provided under the Witness Learned senior counsel submits igh Powered Committee. He wa rotection Scheme, 2018. Two person 15.07.2009 registered under Sectio Arms Act at Police Station Madhuba ny time cause injury to him. He l injury. Learned State counsel submits tha the matter and accordingly security NJAB AND HARYANA GARH CWP-14148-2026 Date of Decision: 07.05.2026 …Petitioner …Respondents AGMOHAN BANSAL cate, with asjeet Singh Brar, Advocates, aryana. t petition under Articles 226/227 of on to the respondents to immediately itness Protection Scheme, 2018. bmits that petitioner was granted e was provided security under the persons out of five accused in FIR Sections 342 & 395 IPC and Section dhuban, Karnal are roaming freely. . He has apprehension of physical its that competent authority has re- ecurity has been withdrawn. The of ately anted r the FIR ction eely. sical - The VIMAL KUMAR 2026.05.07 18:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-14148-202 petitioner is at lib stage, finds that t 4. The on account of 15.07.2009. The matter relates to threat perception case cannot dete security or not. 5. Acc petitioner to app authority, if peti accordance with 07.05.2026 Vimal Wh Wh 2026 -2- is at liberty to make representation and s that there is threat perception, proper The petitioner was provided securit t of attack upon him and registr . The trial Court has convicted two tes to an incident which occurred in eption has to be examined by the au ot determine question as to whether Accordingly, the petition stands di to approach the authorities. The Cou if petitioner moves an application, w with prevailing policy. Whether speaking/reasoned Ye Whether reportable Ye on and if competent authority, at any proper security would be provided. security in the form of two gunmen registration of FIR No.145 dated d two of the accused. The criminal red in July, 2009. The question of the authorities. This Court in every hether a particular person deserves nds disposed of with liberty to the he Court is sanguine that competent ion, would address his grievance in (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No t any men dated inal n of very erves o the etent ce in AL) VIMAL KUMAR 2026.05.07 18:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document