RFA-392 131 (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Ram Dhan Dass and anr. State of Haryana and another CORAM: Present: HARKESH CM-2250 Devi is allowed, as prayed for, subject to all just exceptions. The applicants mentioned in brought on record as legal representatives of appellant No. (Kailasho Devi) parties is taken on record. MAIN CASE Kumar Vs. State of Haryana and another even date. 27.01.2026 sanjay 3923-2006 (O&M) [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ***** RFA Date of Decision: 27.01.2026 Ram Dhan Dass and anr. Versus State of Haryana and another CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Present: Mr.Ashish Gupta, Advocate Mr. G.S. Bidhan, Advocate for the appellants/landowners Mr.Abhinash Jain, DAG Haryana. Mr. Pritam Singh Saini, Advocate and Ms. Surbhi Rana, Advocate for respondent No.2 -.- HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) 2250-CI-2025 Application for impleading LRs of appellant No. is allowed, as prayed for, subject to all just exceptions. The applicants mentioned in para 2 of the application are ordered to be brought on record as legal representatives of appellant No. Kailasho Devi), to pursue the present appeal. Amended memo of parties is taken on record. Registry to tag the same at appropriate place. MAIN CASE: For orders, see RFA No.3922 Kumar Vs. State of Haryana and another even date. 27.01.2026 Whether speaking/reasoned? Whether Reportable? IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RFA-3923-2006 (O&M) Date of Decision: 27.01.2026 …….Appellants Versus ..….Respondents HARKESH MANUJA Ashish Gupta, Advocate Mr. G.S. Bidhan, Advocate /landowners. Abhinash Jain, DAG Haryana. Mr. Pritam Singh Saini, Advocate and Ms. Surbhi Rana, Advocate for respondent No.2-HAFED. Application for impleading LRs of appellant No.2-Kailasho is allowed, as prayed for, subject to all just exceptions. The the application are ordered to be brought on record as legal representatives of appellant No. , to pursue the present appeal. Amended memo of Registry to tag the same at appropriate place. RFA No.3922-2006, titled as Shiv Kumar Vs. State of Haryana and another, decided vide order of (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No Yes/No HAFED. Kailasho is allowed, as prayed for, subject to all just exceptions. The the application are ordered to be brought on record as legal representatives of appellant No. 2 , to pursue the present appeal. Amended memo of 2006, titled as Shiv , decided vide order of (HARKESH MANUJA) SANJAY GUPTA 2026.01.30 19:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document