Serial No. 48 SUPPL. CAUSE LIST-I HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR WP(C) 1067/2026 CM(2788/2026) Union Territory of J&K and Ors. …Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Abdul Rashid Malik, Sr. AAG with Mr. Mohd Younis Hafiz, Assisting Counsel Vs. Gh Qaaddir Mir and Others ...Respondent(s) Through: CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR, JUDGE. HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR, JUDGE. ORDER 12.05.2026 01. Impugned in this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is an order dated 21st July, 2025, passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Srinagar Bench [“the Tribunal”] in OA No. 752/2025 titled “Gh. Qaaddir Mir and Ors. Vs. Union Territory of J&K and Ors”, whereby the Tribunal has disposed of the OA filed by the respondents with a direction to the petitioners herein to consider the claim of the respondents for continuation of the benefits granted to them under SRO 59 of 1990, by passing a reasoned and speaking order, in accordance with the applicable rules and law. 02. A perusal of the impugned order reveals that the Tribunal has not given any finding with regard to the entitlement or otherwise of the respondents to the benefit of SRO 59 of 1990. Needless to say, the issue concerning applicability and extension MIR ARIF MANZOOR I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 13.05.26 of such benefits has already engaged the attention of this Court in a number of cases involving similar questions of fact and law. 03. Be that as it may, since the directions issued by the Tribunal are innocuous in nature and call upon the petitioners to consider and pass a reasoned order, we do not find any compelling reason to interfere with the impugned order in exercise of writ jurisdiction. 04. In view of the aforesaid, we find no merit in this petition and the same is, accordingly, dismissed. (SANJAY PARIHAR) (SANJEEV KUMAR) JUDGE JUDGE SRINAGAR: 12.05.2026 “Mir Arif” MIR ARIF MANZOOR I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 13.05.26