- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8292 RSA No. 584 of 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 584 OF 2009 (DEC/INJ) BETWEEN: 1. ERAMMA W/O YELE GOVINDAPPA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS. 2. YELE GOVINDAPPA S/O LATE GIRIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, BOTH ARE R/AT KARIDASARAHALLI CHIRTHALLI DAKHALE HULIKUNTE HOBLI, SIRA TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT-572137. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. LAKSHMIKANTHA K., ADVOCATE - ABSENT) AND: 1. NINGAMMA W/O LATE NAGANNA, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, 2. RANGAPPA S/O LATE NAGANNA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, 3. RAMANNA S/O LATE NAGANNA AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8292 RSA No. 584 of 2009 4. UMESHA S/O LATE NAGANNA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, 5. SHIVAMMA D/O LATE NAGANNA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, ALL ARE R/AT KARIDASARAHALLI, CHIRTHALLI DAKHALE, HULIKUNTE HOBLI, SIRA TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT-572137. 6. JAYAMMA W/O BOPPARAYAPPA D/O LATE NAGAPPA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/AT VEERANAHALLI, HULIKUNTE HOBLI, SIRA TAKLUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT-572137. 7. MUDALAGIRIYAPPA S/O GIRIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/AT KARIDASARAHALLI, CHIRTHALLI DAKHALE, HULIKUNTE HOBLI, SIRA TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT-572137. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. H.N.PRAKASH, ADVOCATE FOR R1-R6; R7 - SERVED BUT UNREPRESENTED) THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS LISTED FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, THE JUDGMENT IS DELIVERED AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8292 RSA No. 584 of 2009 ORAL ORDER Though matter called twice, there is no representation on behalf of the appellants, either personally or through video conferencing. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the appeal was listed on 28.01.2026, on that day, there was no representation on behalf of the appellants. Hence, for appearance of counsel for the appellants it was ordered to be listed on 11.02.2026. The appeal is listed today. A perusal of the appeal papers would reflect that the appeal is filed in 2009. Now we are in 2026. The appeal is pending for seventeen years. As already noted above, though matter called twice, there is no representation on behalf of the appellants, either personally or through video conferencing. It appears that the appellants are not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8292 RSA No. 584 of 2009 Because of dismissal of the appeal, interim order granted if any stands discharged and pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of. SD/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE MRP List No.: 2 Sl No.: 1