IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No.9491 of 2026 Decided on 23rd June 2026 Meena Devi …Petitioner Versus HPSEB Limited and another …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner: Mr. Raman Parashar, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Piyush Rathore, Advocate. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) By way of this writ petition, the petitioner has, inter alia, prayed for the following relief:- “(i) That the respondents may be ordered to allow the petitioner to continue in service upto the age of 60 years in terms of th judgment passed by this Hon’ble Court in Satya Devi’s case as well as Nago Devi case, with all benefits incidental thereof.” 2. In light of the prayer made in the writ petition, as agreed, this petition is disposed of with the direction that the parties shall be bound by the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court that shall be passed in Satya Devi’s case. 2 3. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge June 23, 2026 (Vinod)