HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 9923 of 2026 Court No. - 36 HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J. 1. Today learned counsel for the petitioner is not present. Sri S.N.Tripathi, learned counsel for contesting respondent is present 2.In the aforesaid circumstances, writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution with cost of Rs.1000/- to be deposited in the Bank account of High Court Legal Services Committee within a week. 3. Registry would accept any application for restoration, if filed, only with proof of payment of cost. 4. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 5. A copy of this order be sent to the petitioner at his given address. 6. Court takes note that there is an alternative remedy available to the petitioner to challenge the impugned order and this order will not come in the way if petitioner avails the alternative remedy. October 8, 2026 SB Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arun Kumar Srivastava, Priyanka Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : Mohit Verma, Sachida Nand Tripathi, Avinash Chandra Srivastava, C.S.C. (Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.) Brajesh Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SANDEEP BHATTACHARYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- SANDEEP BHATTACHARYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad