Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12880 (JHR)

ANKNA ANAND ALIAS ANKANA JAISWAL v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

WPC/2429/2020 · 2026-05-11

Sri Ananda Sen

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:14189 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No.2429 of 2020 ------ 1. Ankna Anand @ Ankana Jaiswal, wife of Ravi Prakash Jaiswal @ Ravi Jaiswal @ Ravi Kumar. 2. Ravi Prakash Jaiswal @ Ravi Jaiswal @ Ravi Kumar, son of Raj Kumar Choudhary. Both resident of Adarsh Nagar, Pandra (Jatra Maidan), Panchsheel Nagar, P.O. Hehel, P.S. Sukhdeonagar, District Ranchi. … … Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. Deputy Commissioner, Ranchi, P.O., G.P.O., P.S. Kotwali, District Ranchi. 3. Circle Officer, Ratu, P.O. & P.S. Ratu, District Ranchi. 4. Circle Officer, Kanke, P.O. & P.S. Kanke, District Ranchi. … … Respondents ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Ms. Nivedita Kundu, Advocate For the Respondent(s): Mr. Mohan Dubey, AC to AG ------ 17/ 11.05.2026 By filing this writ petition, the petitioners have prayed for the following reliefs:- “for issuance of appropriate Writ or Writs, direction or directions, order or orders to set aside the notice dated 18-06-2020 in respect to Encroachment Case No.6 (Annexure-3) issued to petitioner No.2 under section 6(2) of the Bihar Public Land Encroachment Act, 1956 by the Respondent No.3 in respect to the land situated at Plot No.499 Area Boundary Wall, Village Nawa Soso, Thana No.150, P.S. Ratu, District Ranchi; AND Petitioners further pray for issuance of appropriate Writ or Writs, direction or directions, order or orders to quash / set aside the entire proceeding of Encroachment Case 2026:JHHC:14189 2 No.6 initiated against the petitioners under the provision of Bihar Public Land Encroachment Act, 1956 by issuing Notice dated 18-06-2020 u/s 6(2) of the Act by the Respondent No.3 (Annexure-3) in respect to the land of petitioners situated at Plot No.499 Area Boundary Wall, village Nawa Soso, Thana No.150, P.S. Ratu, District Ranchi.” 2. Heard learned counsel representing the petitioners and learned counsel representing the respondents. 3. After going through the impugned notice dated 18.06.2020 in Encroachment Case No.06 (Annexure-3 to the writ petition), I find that it has been alleged that the petitioners have encroached over Plot No.499, area - Boundary Wall, Village Nawa Soso, Thana No.150, P.S. Ratu, District Ranchi, thus a proceeding under Section 6(2) of the Bihar Public Land Encroachment Act, 1956, in Encroachment Case No.06 had been initiated against petitioners and notice dated 18.06.2020 had been issued to petitioner No.2. 4. Since merely a notice has been issued to the petitioners, I am not inclined to interfere with the said notice. The petitioners should appear and give reply to the said notice. 4.1. If the petitioners file or have filed any reply to the notice, the respondents after hearing the parties, will dispose the Encroachment Case No.06, by passing a detailed reasoned order, if not already disposed of. 4.2. If the aforesaid Encroachment case has already been disposed of, a copy of the final order should be communicated to the petitioners. 2026:JHHC:14189 3 4.3. Thereupon, considering the nature of the order, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to take appropriate steps as per law. 5. With the aforesaid observations, this writ petition stands disposed of. 6. Pending interlocutory applications being I.A. Nos.1403 of 2026 and 15463 of 2025, also stand disposed of. (ANANDA SEN, J.) 11th May, 2026 Prashant. Cp-2 Uploaded on 16.05.2026