KU. ANKITA SUBHASH NIRMAL v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, MUMBAI AND OTHERS
WP/6864/2025 · 2026-09-29
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 12879 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 12879 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 wp 6864.25.25 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, AT NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION NO. 6864 OF 2025 ( Ku. Ankita Subhash Nirmal ..vs.. State of Maharashtra, through its Secretary, Department of Education, Mumbai and others ) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Ms. Mansi Saraykar, Counsel h/f. Mr. Anand Parchure, Counsel for the petitioner, Mr. S.B. Bissa, A.G.P. for respondent Nos. 1 to 3, Mr. S.S. Shingane, Counsel for respondent Nos. 4 and 5. CORAM : ANIL L. PANSARE & NIVEDITA P. MEHTA, JJ. DATED : 29 th SEPTEMBER, 2026
Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner. 2. We have perused the record and gone through the reliefs sought in the present writ petition. Having regard to the nature of the reliefs sought in the present petition, we find that the grievance raised by the petitioner can appropriately be considered and decided by the Grievance Committee constituted pursuant to the Order dated 16-06-2026 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.1775 of 2026. Since the reliefs sought by the petitioner squarely fall within the jurisdiction of the said Committee, we deem it appropriate to relegate the petitioner to avail the said remedy.
Accordingly, the petitioner is at liberty to approach the Grievance Committee, which shall consider and decide the petitioner’s grievance, as expeditiously as possible and in accordance with law. 3. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of in the aforesaid terms. All contentions of the parties are kept open. 4. Interim order passed by this Court on 12-11-2025 shall continue to operate for a further period of two weeks from today. (Nivedita P. Mehta, J.) (Anil L. Pansare, J.) adgokar 2026:BHC-NAG:12857-DB Signed by: MR. P.M. ADGOKAR Designation: Senior Pvt. Secretary Date: 29/09/2026 14:43:32