Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12876 (AP)

TRUST ASSOCIATION OF CBCNC v. TERAPALLI DAIVA SAHAYA KUMAR

CRP/3100/2019 · 2026-10-08

A Hari Haranadha Sarma

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 AHHS,J C.R.P.No. 3100 of 2019 Dated 13.10.2026 APHC010351752019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3520] FRIDAY, THE 9th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3100 OF 2019 Between: 1. TRUST ASSOCIATION OF CBCNC, REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN, DASARI SAMUEL, S/O BHUSHANAM, CHRISTIAN, AGE 56 YEARS, RIO CBCNC, CHURCH COMPOUND, KAIKALURU, KRISHNA DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. TERAPALLI DAIVA SAHAYA KUMAR, , S/O SAMUEL, CHRISTIAN, AGE ABOUT 60 YEARS, RIO YELLAMANCHILI, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT 2. GUMMADI PRASANNA KUMAR, S/O BARNABAS, CHRISTIAN, AGE ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC. EMPLOYEE IN MMTC, ROCK-DALE BUNGALOW, VISAKHAPATNAM ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M M M SRINIVASA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. P HEMACHANDRA The Court made the following: 2 AHHS,J C.R.P.No. 3100 of 2019 Dated 13.10.2026 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3100 OF 2019 ORDER: 1. This Civil Revision Petition has been preferred against the Order, dated 26.09.2019, in E.A.No.368 of 2019 in E.A.No.4 of 2017 in E.P.No.240 of 2016 in O.S.No. 86 of 1997 passed by the Principal Civil Judge (Senior Division), Visakhapatnam, which was an application filed under Order XXVI, Rules 9 and 10 read with Section 151 of the Civil Procedure Code for appointment of the Advocate Commissioner by the claimant and the said application was dismissed. 2. On 25.08.2026, there was no representation for both sides and the matter was adjourned to 11.09.2026, directing to be listed under the caption for dismissal. On 11.09.2026 also, there was no representation and the matter was adjourned directing to list under the caption “for dismissal for non-prosecution”. 3. Today also, there is no representation. The E.P., of the year 2006 is still pending in view of the Civil Revision Petition. 4. Since the petitioner is not prosecuting the case, the petition deserves dismissal for non-prosecution. 5. Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for non- prosecution/default. 3 AHHS,J C.R.P.No. 3100 of 2019 Dated 13.10.2026 Consequently, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, in this case shall stand closed. . _______________________________________ SRI JUSTICE A.HARI HARANADHA SARMA, J Dated 09.10.2026 KS 4 AHHS,J C.R.P.No. 3100 of 2019 Dated 13.10.2026 122 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3100 OF 2019 Dated:09.10.2026. KS