Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12871 (GAU)

Tai Nikio v. Tadar Mangku

IA(C)/179/2026 · 2026-08-26

Kardak Ete

Public Interest Litigationbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC040008752024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : IA(C)/179/2026 Tai Nikio Age: 55 Occupation : Address:Son of late Tai Kami permanent resident of Village Peel PO and PS Sangram Kurung Kumey District Arunachal Pradesh 791118 and presently residing at Karsingsa Doimukh Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh 791123 VERSUS Tadar Mangku Age: 55 Occupation : Address:Son of Late Tadar Tagam permanent resident of Village Langth Loth PO and PS Nyapin Kurung Kumey District Arunachal Pradesh 791118 and presently residing at Pachin Colony PO and PS Naharlagun Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh 791110 ------------ Advocate for applicant : Rinchin Ledo Thungon Advocate for responden : K Posi appearing for Tadar Mangku: Advocate appearing for respectively. Linked Case :Election Pet./7/2024 Page No.# 2/2 Tadar Mangku Son of Late Tadar Tagam, permanent resident of Village Langht Loth, PO and PS Nyapin, Kurung Kumey District, Arunachal Pradesh 791118 and presently residing at Pachin Colony, PO and PS Naharlagun, Papumpare District, Arunachal Pradesh 791110 VERSUS Tai Nikio Son of Late Tai Kami, permanent resident of Village Peel, PO and PS Sangram, Kurung Kumey District, Arunachal Pradesh 791118 and presently residing at Karsingsa, Doimukh, Papumpare District, Arunachal Pradesh 791123 Advocate for the Petitioner : D J Kapil, D Tadar,K Posi Advocate for the Respondent : Pritam Taffo, Sr. Adv, Tabing Lamgu,1 P K Tiwari, Sr. Advocate,Rinchin Ledo Thungon BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE ORDER Date : 27.08.2026 Heard Mr. P. K. Tiwari, learned Senior Counsel, assisted by Mr. R. L. Thungon, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mr. R. Biswas, learned counsel, along with Mr. D. J. Kapil, learned counsel for the opposite party/election petitioner. Mr. Tiwari, learned Senior Counsel, submits that he is not pressing the present interlocutory application. Accordingly, the interlocutory application stands closed as not pressed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant