[2026:RJ-JP:30514] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9388/2026 CNR: RJHC020567362026 | URN: CRLMB / 17279U / 2026 Naima @ Nemichand S/o Harbhajan, Aged About 43 Years, R/o Naya Gaanv Mafi, P.s. Halaina, District - Bharatpur, (Raj.) (Presently Confined In District Jail, Alwar Dist. Alwar) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anupam Sharma Mr. Harshit Parashar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 05/08/2026 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.358/2024 registered at Police Station Kathumar, District-Alwar for offences under Sections 331(4) and 305(a) of BNS. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the allegation against the present petitioner pertains to the theft of ornaments from the house of the complainant. He again submits that co-accused Suresh has been enlarged on bail by this Court on 11.11.2025. While there are twenty cases pending against the petitioner, he has been acquitted in twelve of them, [2026:RJ-JP:30514] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-9388/2026] and in the remaining cases, he has been granted bail. Petitioner is behind the bars since 22.05.2026. Charge-sheet has been filed. The trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody and on the ground of parity with other co-accused, the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in the light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner-Naima @ Nemichand S/o Harbhajan be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial with following further conditions:- (i) that the petitioner shall mark his presence before the SHO, Police Station Kathumar District Alwar in every 15 days of each month till conclusion of trial. (ii) The concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register for this purpose. In case, the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned Police Station [2026:RJ-JP:30514] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-9388/2026] as directed above, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to trial court in this regard. (iii) that the petitioner shall not repeat any such offence in future. (iv) If breach of any of the directions is reported or come to the notice of the trial court the same shall alone be a reason for learned Public Prosecutor to apply for cancellation of bail. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/89