Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12861 (ALL)

MAYANK AGRAWAL v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

TACR/596/2026 · 2026-10-04

Vikram D Chauhan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD TRANSFER APPLICATION (CRIMINAL) No. - 596 of 2026 Court No. - 55 HON'BLE VIKRAM D. CHAUHAN, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for applicant, Sri Baleshwar Chaturvedi, learned counsel for opposite party no.2 and learned AGA for the State. 2. The present transfer application has been filed for transfer of the Case i.e. S.T. No. 564 of 2021 (State Versus Mayank Agrawal & others), arising out of Case Crime No.469 of 2020 under Section 420 I.P.C. & 136 of the Electricity Act, Police Station Highway, District Mathura, pending in the court of learned Special Judge (E.C. Act)/Additional Session Judge, Mathura to the nearest District from Mathura for fair trial of the case. 3. It is submitted by learned counsel for applicant that Additional District Government Counsel of the court concerned is not permitting the trial court to proceed. 4. Perusal of the order sheet of the trial court would go to show that prosecution witnesses are not being produced. 5. Learned counsel for opposite party no.2 has stated that prosecution witnesses of the department would be produced before the trial court. 6. At this stage, learned counsel for the parties submitted that the trial may be directed to be concluded in a time bound manner. 7. In view of submission of learned counsel for parties, let the trial of the case be concluded within a period of one year from the date of production of a certified copy of this order without giving unnecessary Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Kamlesh Kumar Dwivedi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Baleshwar Chaturvedi, G.A. Mayank Agrawal .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) adjournment of the parties. Prosecution shall produce prosecution witnesses before the trial court. If any warrant has been issued by the trial court against prosecution witnesses or accused, the State shall oblige to immediately execute the aforesaid warrant and submit it's report before the trial court. 8. Copy of this order shall be sent to S.S.P./S.P., Mathura for compliance. 9. With the aforesaid observation/direction, the transfer application is disposed of. October 5, 2026 D. Tamang TACR No. 596 of 2026 2 (Vikram D. Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- DHIRENDRA TAMANG High Court of Judicature at Allahabad