TAHIR ANSARI ALIAS BUDHA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./3901/2026 · 2026-05-11
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 12857 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 12857 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:JHHC:14243] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 3901 of 2026
Tahir Ansari @ Budha aged about 57 years son of Late Abdul Subhan Ansari, resident of village- Simatand, Kandra, PO Ram Nagar, P S - Mahuda, District- Dhanbad … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
… Opp. Party
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
For the Petitioner : Ms. Pinki Kumari, Adv. For the State : Mr. Arup Kr. Dey , Addl.. PP
02 / 11.05.2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with S.T. case no. 48 of 2026 arising out Nawadih P. S. case no. 62 of 2024 instituted under Section 310(2) of BNS,
2023.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner along with the co-accused committed dacoity and looted cash of Rs. 60,000/- and jewelries. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that without putting the petitioner on TIP, as mentioned in para 8 of the Bail Application, chargesheet has been submitted against the petitioner. It is further submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that charge has also been famed but no witness has been examined in this case. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in jail custody since 17.10.2025, as mentioned in para 9 of this bail application. It is next submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is ready and willing to co-operate with the trial of the case and undertakes not to annoy or disturb the
informant or the other witness of the case or victim or their family members in any manner during trial of the case hence, the petitioner may be admitted to bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposed the prayer for bail. Considering submissions of learned counsels and the facts as stated above, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Hence, the court below is directed to release the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Bermo at Tenughat in connection with S.T. case no. 48 of 2026 arising out Nawadih P. S. case no. 62 of 2024 with the condition that the petitioner will not annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case or the victim or their family members in any manner during trial of the case and will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish mobile phone number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change the mobile phone number during the trial of the case.
(ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.)
Dated 11.05.2026
Smita/-