Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12856 (PAT)

Pankaj Kumar Mandal @ Pankaj v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./17260/2026 · 2026-03-19

Sandeep Kumar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17260 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-95 Year-2025 Thana- FALKA District- Katihar ====================================================== Pankaj Kumar Mandal @ Pankaj Son of Late Birendra Mandal Resident of Village - Sohtha, P.S. - Falka, Dist. - Katihar. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Suresh Prasad Sah For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Damodar Prasad Tiwary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2 19-03-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Falka P.S. Case No. 95 of 2025 registered for the offence under Sections 140(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner is accused of committing road robbery. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has not committed any offence. Petitioner is in custody since 13.08.2025. He further submits that some co-accused persons have been granted bail by co- ordinate Bench of this Court. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail and has submitted that the petitioner Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17260 of 2026(2) dt.19-03-2026 2/2 is named accused in the FIR. Sufficient materials have come during the investigation to connect the petitioner with the crime. 6. I have considered the submissions of the parties and have gone through the records of the case. Considering the allegations levelled against the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant regular bail to the petitioner even though some co-accused persons have been granted bail. 7. Accordingly, this application for regular bail stands rejected. Shishir/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U T