Abdul Waseem vs. Punjab & Sind Bank Cr.MP(M) No. 672 of 2026. 25.05.2026 Present: Mr. Umesh Kanwar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Arvind Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that he does not want to file any reply to the application. For the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed and the delay of one year, seven months and twenty five days in filing the revision petition is condoned. The application stands disposed of. Cr.Revision No. of 2026 (Cr.RST No.2722 of 2026. Since the delay in filing the revision petition has been condoned as per order passed in Cr.MP(M) No. 672 of 2026. It be registered. Notice. Mr. Arvind Sharma, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the respondent/Bank. He submits on behalf of the respondent that matter has been reconciled between the parties. In view of this statement, petitioner is directed to deposit 7.5% of the cheque amount before Member, Secretary, H.P. Legal Services Authority, Kasumpti, Shimla, as per the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court in Sanjabij Tari vs. Kishore S. Brocar and another (2025) SCC Online SC 2069 [2025 INSC 1158] and list the matter thereafter. (Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 23rd June, 2026 (ravinder)