Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12850 (CHH)

MOHAMMAD SAJJAD v. KHURSHIDA BANO

FA/118/2023 · 2026-02-05

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:6750 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR FA No. 118 of 2023 1 - Mohammad Sajjad S/o Haji Nazar Mohammad @ Bahadur Khan Aged About 51 Years R/o Chandamri, Raigarh, Teh. And District Raigarh (C.G.) 2 - Shafat Mohammad S/o Haji Nagar Mohammad @ Bahadur Khan Aged About 50 Years R/o Muslim Ganj, Turkapara, Raigarh Teh. And District Raigarh (C.G.) Appellants versus 1 - Khurshida Bano W/o Aashik Ali Aged About 52 Years R/o Turkapara Raigarh, Teh. And District Raigarh (C.G.) 2 - Mu. Imtiyaz Bee W/o Hazi Nagar Mohammad Aged About 73 Years Turkapara, Raigarh, Teh. And District Raigarh (C.G.) 3 - Jabbar Mohammad S/o Nazar Mohammad Aged About 43 Years Turkapara Raigarh, Teh. And District Raigarh (C.G.) 4 - Abbas Mohammad S/o Nazar Mohammad Aged About 46 Years Turkapara Raigarh, Teh. And District Raigarh (C.G.) 5 - Akbari W/o Lt. Gaffar Mohammad Aged About 34 Years R/o Turkapara Raigarh, Teh. And District Raigarh (C.G.) 6 - Siraz S/o Lt. Gaffar Mohammad Aged About 19 Years R/o Turkapara, Raigarh, Teh. And District Raigarh (C.G.) 7 - Raj S/o Lt. Gaffar Mohammad Aged About 18 Years R/o Turkapara Raigarh, Teh. And District Raigarh (C.G.) RAHUL JHA Digitally signed by RAHUL JHA Date: 2026.02.06 16:10:39 +0530 2 8 - Mohammad Rajjak S/o Nazar Mohammad Aged About 40 Years R/o Turkapara, Raigarh, Teh. And District Raigarh (C.G) Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Appellant(s) : Ms. Hamida Siddique, Advocate For Resp No.1 : Mr. Hari Agrawal, Advocate (HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE BIBHU DATTA GURU) Order on Board 06/02/2026 1. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that owing to a bona fide confusion, the appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure has been preferred before this Court, though the same is not maintainable. She, therefore, prays for permission to withdraw the appeal with liberty to approach the appropriate forum in accordance with law. 2. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. 3. The interim relief, if any, granted earlier stands vacated. Sd/- (BIBHU DATTA GURU) JUDGE Rahul