HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 13014 of 2026 Court No. - 68 HON'BLE ASHUTOSH SRIVASTAVA, J. Heard Shri Adesh Kumar under the authority of Ms. Barkha Chaudhary, learned counsel for the applicant, Shri Ramendra Pal Singh, learned AGA for the State, Shri B. S. Khokhar, learned counsel for the first informant and perused the record. This bail application under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been moved on behalf of accused-applicant, Sanjay @ Pintu, seeking enlargement on bail in Case Crime No. 06 of 2026, under Sections 191 (2), 191(3), 190, 109, 308 (5), 351 (3), 3 (5), 61 (2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Police Station Chandinagar, District Baghpat, during the pendency of the trial before the Court below. Learned counsel for the applicant argued that the accused-applicant is innocent. He has been falsely implicated in this very case crime number and is languishing in jail since 5.12.2024. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant was not named in the FIR. In the majeed statement of first informant, name of the applicant surfaced on the record. Present case is no injury case. At the time of incident, the applicant was behind the bar. Role of firing has been assigned to the co-accused person. Role of conspiracy has been assigned against the applicant. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that co-accused Tejveer, who was also not named in the FIR, has already been granted bail by this Court on 16.4.2026 passed in Crl. Misc. Bail Application No. 11005 of 2026 Applicant has 19 cases of criminal history which have sufficiently been explained and there is no Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Barkha Chaudhary, Sarita Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. B.S. Khokhar Sanjay @ Pintu .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) likelihood of his fleeing from course of justice or tampering with evidence in case of release on bail. Hence, bail has been prayed for. Learned AGA as well as learned counsel for the first informant have vehemently opposed the prayer for bail. Considering all above facts and circumstances, the nature of accusations, severity of the punishment in the case of conviction and nature of supporting evidence, reasonable apprehension of tampering with the witness and prima facie, but without commenting on merit of case, a case for bail is made out. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. Let the accused-applicant, Sanjay @ Pintu, involved in above mentioned case crime number be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and two reliable sureties each, in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant will not tamper with the evidence. 2. The applicant will not indulge in any criminal activity. 3. The applicant will not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witnesses and co-operate in the trial. 4. The applicant will appear regularly on each and every date fixed by the trial court, unless his personal appearance is exempted through counsel by the court concerned. In the event of breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the court below will be at liberty to proceed to cancel his bail. April 20, 2026 Ravi Prakash BAIL No. 13014 of 2026 2 (Ashutosh Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVI PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad