POOJA MEENA DAUGHTER OF SHRI PAWAN KUMAR MEENA, WIFE OF SHRI MANISH MEENA v. THE SECRETARY, RAJASTHAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSIONER
WMAP/390/2019 · 2026-08-14
Sanjeev Prakash Sharma
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 12844 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 12844 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:32349] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Writ Miscellaneous Application No.390/2019 CNR: RJHC021088722019 | URN: WMAP / 769U / 2019 In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.16162/2018 Pooja Meena Daughter Of Shri Pawan Kumar Meena, Wife Of Shri Manish Meena, Aged About 30 Years, Resident of 703, Akshat Nilay, Hawa Sadak, Civil Lines, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Non Applicant-Petitioner Versus
1. The Secretary, Rajasthan Public Service Commissioner, Ajmer (Rajasthan) ----Respondent/ Applicant
2. Assistant Secretary, Rajasthan Public Service Commis- sioner, Ajmer (Rajasthan) ----Respondent/ Applicant
3. Union Of India Through The Secretary (Textiles), Ministry Of Textiles, New Delhi (India)
4. Registrar, National Institute Of Fashion Technology, New Delhi (India). ----Non Applicants-Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Mirza Faisal Baig, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr.Shashi Shekhar Gaur, Adv. for Mr.V.P. Mathur, Adv.
HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR. SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
Order 14/08/2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties at length.
2.
Learned counsel appearing for the RPSC Mr. M.F. Baig, submits that the RPSC was not afforded an opportunity of hearing at the time of deciding the writ petition. Although counsel had appeared on behalf of the RPSC on that date, Mr. M.F. Baig was
[2026:RJ-JP:32349] (2 of 2) [WMAP-390/2019] not available and, therefore, the matter was decided in his absence.
3. The order passed by this Court does not warrant any interference nor does it require for recall.
4. The application is misconceived and is, accordingly, dismissed.
(SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA), ACTING CJ 66/Himanshu Soni