Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12840 (GAU)

MD. EBRAHIM ALI v. THE UNION OF INDIA AND 5 ORS.

WP(C)/9424/2019 · 2026-08-19

Kalyan Rai Surana, Pranjal Das

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010313532019 2026:GAU-AS:11972 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/9424/2019 MD. EBRAHIM ALI S/O- LATE HUSSAIN ALI, R/O- ROSE GOLI AMOLAPATTY, P.S. AND DIST.- DIBRUGARH, ASSAM. VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND 5 ORS. REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF INDIA, HOME AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT, NEW DELHI-1. 2:THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM HOME DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-06. 3:THE ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA NEW DELHI-01 INDIA 4:THE STATE CO-ORDINATOR NRC ASSAM 5:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER DIBRUGARH P.O. AND DIST.- DIBRUGARH ASSAM. 6:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE (B) DIBRUGARH P.O. AND DIST.- DIBRUGARH Page No.# 2/2 ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M B U AHMED, B J BAROOAH Advocate for the Respondent : ASSTT.S.G.I., SC, F.T,SC, NRC,SC, ECI BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS ORDER Date : 20.08.2026 (K.R. Surana, J) None appears on call for the petitioner. However, all the respondents are represented. The petitioner remained un-represented on 28.07.2026, and on the said date it is provided that in the event if the petitioner remains absent or un- represented, adverse order will follow. As the petitioner remained un-represented, the writ petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution. The consequences of the impugned opinion shall follow. The Registry is directed to return back the records of the Tribunal along with a copy of this order to be made a part of the record by the said learned Tribunal. JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant