Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12839 (RAJ)

RAMBABU S/O TIKA RAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/1974/2025 · 2026-08-12

Sudesh Bansal

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:31899] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1974/2025 CNR: RJHC020072962025 | URN: CW / 5323U / 2025 1 Rambabu S/o Tika Ram, Resident Of - Roopbas Town, District- Bharatpur, Rajasthan. 2 Laxmi Narain S/o Tika Ram, Resident Of - Roopbas Town, District- Bharatpur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1 State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Public Works Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2 District Collector, Bharatpur, Rajasthan. 3 Secretary, Department Of Health, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur, Raj. 4 Chief Medical Officer, Bharatpur, Rajasthan. 5 Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, Bhawan And Path, Bharatpur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Devendra Kumar Mishra For Respondent(s) : Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC Mr. Abhishek Paliwal Ms. Anjum Parveen for Mr. Dheeraj Tripathi HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 12/08/2026 1. Instant Civil Writ Petition has been filed by petitioner under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, assailing the order dated 10.01.2025 passed by Civil Judge & Judicial Magistrate Roopbas, District Bharatpur, dismissing petitioners' application bearing 2/2025 filed under Section 151 CPC during course of pendency of his execution petition bearing No.1/2025 filed under Order 21 Rule 32 CPC. [2026:RJ-JP:31899] (2 of 3) [CW-1974/2025] 2. Heard counsel for both parties and perused the record including the impugned order. 3. It appears that a civil suit for permanent injunction in respect of the land of Khasra No.1050 measuring 1 Bigha 4 Biswa situated at Roopbas town, Tehsil Roopbas, District Bharatpur was instituted by the petitioners which was initially dismissed by the trial Court vide judgment dated 05.10.1993 whereagainst first appeal was filed. In the first appeal vide judgment dated 07.11.2008, petitioners' suit was decreed in following terms: " अतः अपील अपीला गण / वादीगण ीकार की जाकर वान अधीन ायालय ारा पारत आेपत नणय एवं !ी दनांक 5.10.93 अपा" कए जाते ह$। &' गण / &तवादीगण को जरये ाई नषेधा+ा पाब- कया जाता है क वे अपीला गण / वादीगण के वाद/" भूख3 वणत !म 1 वाद प5 जो आराजी खसरा नं. 1050 रकबा 1 बीघा 4 बा वाके मोजा क8ा व तहसील 9पबास का भाग है, म: कोई मदाखलत व महाहमत नहीं कर:गे, कोई तामीर कसी &कार की नहीं कर: न ही करावे । अपीला गण / वादीगण &' / &तवादीगण से ख;ा मुकदमा भी &ा= कर:गे। इसी &कार !ी प;ा मूतव कया जावे।" 4. It appears that thereafter petitioners have filed an application under Order 21 Rule 32 CPC before the Executing Court alleging disobedience of the injunction order passed in their favour and that application is pending for final adjudication. 5. It appears that during course of pendency of application under Order 21 Rule 32 CPC, petitioners filed an application under Section 151 CPC stating inter alia that respondents are raising construction over the land of Khasra No.1050. On that application, in the reply, respondents pointed out that construction is being raised on the land of Khasra No.1049. Learned trial Court in the order impugned dated 10.01.2025 has observed that petitioners are not able to establish that the construction is being raised over the land of Khasra No.1050. It was further observed that the main application under Order 21 Rule 32 CPC, for implementation of the decree dated 07.11.2008, is pending wherein if it is found that [2026:RJ-JP:31899] (3 of 3) [CW-1974/2025] any construction over the land of Khasra no.1050 has been made, the Court may pass appropriate orders. With such observations, application under Section 151 CPC has been dismissed. 6. In the considered opinion of this Court, the Executing Court has rightly dismissed the application under Section 151 CPC since on the miscellaneous application, it is not possible for the Court to identify that the construction by the respondents is being raised on the land of Khasra No.1050 or Khasra No. 1049. Producing the photographs are of no significance to identify the Khasra number of land. Indisputably, petitioners cannot claim their right in excess to the decree, passed in their favour, which is confined to the land of Khasra No.1050 measuring 1 Bigha 4 Biswa. 7. As a result, instant writ petition is hereby dismissed. 8. All pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J 78/RONAK JAIMAN