Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:JHHC:13695] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.3799 of 2026
------ Uday Gond, Aged about 33 years, S/O- Late Jeetu Gond @ Jitu Gond, R/O- Purani Sahibganj, P.O.- Sahibganj, P.S.- Town, District- Sahibganj .... .... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Deepak Sahu, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Praful Jojo, Addl.P.P.
------
Order No:-02 Dated:-07-05-2026
Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Sahibganj Nagar P.S. Case No. 189 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 109(1), 351(3), 352, 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 27 of the Arms Act.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner, in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons, attempted to commit murder by firing upon the daughter of the informant, but the bullet missed the target and when the informant went inside her house, the petitioner started firing at her house and they smashed the glass panel of an e-rickshaw parked outside the house of the informant, they also kicked the door due to which door’s top panel broke and they also broke the back window of the house of the informant. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and the petitioner has been implicated in this case only on the basis of the confessional statement of the co-accused persons. It is also submitted that no one has sustained any injury. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 28.02.2026 as is evident from para-01 of the instant bail application. It is lastly submitted that the
petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is
directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sahibganj in connection with Sahibganj Nagar P.S. Case No. 189 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 07.05.2026 Saroj/