Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12832 (RAJ)

VEER TEJA GAUSHALA SAMITI v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/15348/2026 · 2026-08-11

Anand Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:31520] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15348/2026 CNR: RJHC020772302026 | URN: CW / 32694U / 2026 Veer Teja Gaushala Samiti, Khijuriya Jatan, Tehsil Bassi, District Jaipur through its Secretary Gajanand Jat S/o Ramphool Jat, aged about 31 Years, R/o Ahalpura, Palawala Jatan, Tehsil Bassi, District Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Rajasthan through Secretary, Department of Gopalan, Govt. of Rajasthan, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. The Director, Gopalan Govt. of Rajasthan, Jaipur. 3. The District Collector, Jaipur. 4. The Commissioner, Jaipur Development Authority, JLN Marg, Jaipur. 5. The Sub-Division Officer, Bassi, District Jaipur. 6. Tehsildar, Tehsil Bassi, District Jaipur. 7. SHO, Police Station Bassi, District Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Nirmal Kumar Nagar For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 11/08/2026 1. Apprehending demolition of the construction raised by the petitioner over the land bearing Khasra No.150, Village- Khijuriya Jatan, Tehsil-Bassi, by the Jaipur Development Authority, the petitioner has filed the present writ petition. 2. It it stated by learned counsel for the petitioner that one notice under Section 72 of the Jaipur Development Authority Act, 1982 (for short, ‘the Act of 1982’) dated 27.06.2026 was issued against Sh. Kamlesh Godara S/o Ramphool Jaat & other unkonwn persons. Petitioner challenged the said notice by way of filing Appeal No.578/2026, wherein after hearing learned counsel [2026:RJ-JP:31520] (2 of 2) [CW-15348/2026] for the respondent-Jaipur Development Authority, Jaipur, has passed stay order dated 02.07.2026 in following terms: ";g vf/kdj.k tfoizk }kjk tokc izLrqr fd, tkus rd iz'uxr uksfVl ij vfxze dk;Zokgh LFkfxr djrk gSA tokc izLrqr gksus ij ;g vf/kdj.k iqu% fof/kuqlkj vkns'k ikfjr djsxkA ;g vf/kdj.k vihykFkhZ dks vknsf'kr djrk gS fd iz'uxr Hkw[k.M ij dksbZ u;k fuekZ.k ugha djsa ,oa tfoizk dks Hkh vknsf'kr fd;k tkrk gS fd ;fn vihykFkhZ u;k fuekZ.k djrk gS rks tfoizk fof/kuqlkj dk;Zokgh djsA tokc is'k gksus ij vihykFkhZ cgl ugha djrk gS] rks vkt ikfjr varfje LFkxu Lor% gh fujLr le>k tk;sxkA varfje LFkxu dk mijksDrkuqlkj fuLrkj.k fd;k x;kA" 3. Next date of hearing before the Tribunal is 21.08.2026. 4. Grievance of the petitioner is that despite there being stay order passed by the Competent Tribunal, the respondents are adamant to demolish the construction. 5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 6. This Court finds that for similar relief petitioner has already approached Appellate Tribunal, Jaipur Development Authority, Jaipur, by way of filing appeal under Section 83(8)(a) of the Act of 1982, in which, as per petitioner, interim order has also been passed and matter is pending for further consideration, and is posted on 21.08.2026. 7. It is a settled proposition of law that nobody can be allowed to pursue parallel remedies for same relief. Hence, under these circumstances, no interference can be made at this stage in the instant writ petition and the same is hereby dismissed. 8. Pending application(s), if any, also stand(s) disposed of. (ANAND SHARMA),J 23/DAKSH