ANIL ALIAS ANANDRAO HANUMANT RUPNAWAR v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
BA/658/2026 · 2026-09-30
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 12829 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 12829 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
907-BA-658-2026 (CR).docx IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 658 OF 2026 Anil @ Anandrao Hanumant Rupnawar …...Applicant Versus The State Of Maharashtra And Anr …...Respondent —————— Mr. Anand S. Patil for Applicant. Dr. A.A. Takalkar, A.P.P. for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2-State. Mr. Sachin M. Bhavar for the Respondent No.3. —————— Coram : ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J. Date : 30th September 2026.
PER COURT :
1. Heard Mr. Anand Patil, learned Advocate for the Applicant, Dr. Takalkar, learned A.P.P. for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2-State and Mr. Sachin Bhawar, learned Advocate for the Respondent No.3.
2. Dr. Takalkar, learned A.P.P. for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2-State, at the outset submits that the Applicant has various criminal antecedents. She submits that though the Intervener has filed a disclosure affidavit, the same does not make reference to all the criminal antecedents of the Applicant. She therefore, relying upon the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case osk 1 of
2
907-BA-658-2026 (CR).docx of Zeba Khan V/s. State of U.P.1, submits that the present Application is liable to be dismissed.
3. Mr. Sachin Bhawar, learned Advocate for the Respondent No.3, endorses the submissions made by Dr. Takalkar, learned A.P.P. for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2-State.
4. Faced with the aforesaid objection, Mr. Anand Patil, learned Advocate for the Applicant, after admitting the error of not disclosing all the criminal antecedents of the Applicant in the disclosure affidavit, seeks leave to withdraw this Bail Application with liberty to file a fresh Bail Application in accordance with law. This request of Mr. Anand Patil, learned Advocate for the Applicant, is not opposed by Dr. Takalkar, learned A.P.P. for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2-State as also by Mr. Sachin Bhawar, learned Advocate for the Respondent No.3.
5. In view of the statement made by Mr. Anand Patil, learned Advocate for the Applicant, leave is granted to withdraw the present Bail Application with liberty to file a fresh Bail Application after complying with all the requirements of law.
6. Criminal Bail Application No. 658 of 2026 is dismissed as withdrawn.
[ ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J. ] 1 2026 SCC OnLine SC 188 osk 2 of
2 OMKAR SHIVAHAR KUMBHAKARN Digitally signed by OMKAR SHIVAHAR KUMBHAKARN Date: 2026.09.30 20:42:11 +0530