[2026:RJ-JP:30557] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11842/2026 CNR: RJHC020712312026 | URN: CRLMB / 21799U / 2026 1. Ranveer Son of Kailash, aged about 18 years, 04 months, Resident of Village Bhadsuri, Police Station Pisangan, District Ajmer. At present accused petitioner confined in Central Jail Ajmer. 2. Bablu Son of Hemram, aged about 25 years, Resident of village Sumel, Police Station Raas, District Beawar. At present accused petitioner confined in Central Jail Ajmer. ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Raj Kumar Kasana For Respondent(s) : Mr. Naresh Gupta, PP Mr. Krishna Singh HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA Judgment / Order 05/08/2026 1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS, 2023 against the order dated 20.07.2026 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge No.2, District-Ajmer, in Bail Application (CIS) No. 824/2026, whereby the bail application of the petitioners was rejected in connection with F.I.R. No.99/2026, Police Station-Pisangan, District Ajmer, for the offences under Section 115(2), 117(2), 333, 110, 3(5) of the BNS,2023. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners that there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioners of having committed any offences of similar or any other nature in the past. He further submits that the petitioners has been falsely implicated in the FIR. [2026:RJ-JP:30557] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-11842/2026] He submits that there are no serious injuries so as to come under the definition of attempt to culpable homicide. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the parties have entered into compromise and the victim as well as complainant has given their affidavit. He submits that the investigation/trial will take considerable long time. Therefore, he prays that the petitioners be enlarged on bail as the accused are in custody. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application. 5. Counsel appearing for the complainant as well as victim admits the fact that a compromise has been entered between the parties and further, they do not have any object if the bail is granted to the petitioner. 6. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 7. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and upon consideration of the arguments advanced that the parties have entered into compromise; there are no criminal antecedents of the petitioners of having committed any offences of similar or any other nature in the past; investigation/trial will take sufficiently long time; this Court is of the opinion that the bail application filed by the petitioners deserves to be accepted. 8. Consequently, the bail application is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioners - Ranveer S/o Kailash and Bablu Son of Hemram arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.99/2026, Police Station-Pisangan, District Ajmer, shall be released on bail; provided each of them furnishes a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/ [2026:RJ-JP:30557] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-11842/2026] (Rs. One Lakh Only) with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- (Rs. Fifty Thousand Only) each, to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so till the completion of the trial and with additional following conditions: (i) The petitioners shall not leave country without the permission of the Court; (ii) The petitioners shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which they are accused, or suspected, of the commission of which they are suspected; and (iii) The petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. (BIPIN GUPTA),J 81/JUBIN