- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12712 WP No. 10484 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 10484 OF 2024 (SC/ST) BETWEEN: 1. SRI MUNIYAMMA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, W/O LATE NARAYANASWAMY, 2. SRI ANANDA KUMAR AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, S/O LATE NARAYANASWAMY, BOTH ARE RESIDING AT MARANAYAKANAHALLI COLONY JALA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK …PETITIONERS (BY SMT. GOWHARUNNISA, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. VEMAREDDY S., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT, BANGALORE 560009 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BANGALORE NORTH SUB-DIVISION, BANGALORE 560 009 Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12712 WP No. 10484 of 2024 3. SRI SRINIVASA AGED MAJOR, S/O KUDUREGERE ANJINAPPA, R/AT HUTHANAHALLI VILLAGE, JALA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK 4. SRI KRISHNAPPA AGED MAJOR, S/O SMT AKKAYAMMA, W/O SRI SUGURU NANJAPPA, R/AT HUTHANAHALLI VILLAGE, JALA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK 5. SRI H A BHEEMANNA AGED MAJOR, S/O SRI ANJINAPPA, R/AT HUTHANAHALLI VILLAGE, JALA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK 6. SRI VEERAPPA AGED MAJOR, S/O SRI VENKATARAMAIAH R/AT NO 51, MOUNTAIN ROAD, 1ST BLOCK EAST JAYANAGARA, BANGALORE - 560 011 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SHAMANTH NAIK, HCGP FOR R1 AND R2) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO-CALL FOR THE ENTIRE RECORDS FROM THE RESPONDENTS, PERUSE THE SAME, DIRECT QUASHING THE IMPUGNED ORDER DTD 15.12.2023 IN NO. SC.ST APPEAL 114/2013-14 PASSED BY THE R-1 - DC, BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT, BANGALORE AS PER ANNEXURE-A AND ETC. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12712 WP No. 10484 of 2024 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER On 16.02.2026, the following order was passed: "Finally, two weeks time is granted to the petitioners for compliance of office objections, failing which, the writ petition shall be listed for dismissal on 02.03.2026." 2. Matter is called out. There is no representation for the petitioners. 3. Office objections have not been complied with. 4. Consequently, the writ petition stands dismissed for non-compliance of office objections. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE rv List No.: 2 Sl No.: 3